Skip to main content

Table 2 Treatment details and clinical outcomes of patients

From: Pipeline versus Tubridge in the treatment of unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms

 

Total n = 107

PED n = 55

TFD n = 52

P-value

Treatment strategy (n, %)

   

0.504

 FD along

90 (84.1)

45 (81.8)

45 (86.5)

 

 FD and coils

17 (15.9)

10 (18.2)

7 (13.5)

 

Number of FD (n, %)

   

0.753

 1

100 (93.5)

51 (92.7)

49 (94.2)

 

  ≥ 2

7 (6.5)

4 (7.3)

3 (5.8)

 

Complication (n, %)

   

0.737

 Hemorrhagic

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

 Ischemic

9 (8.4)

4 (7.3)

5 (9.6)

 

Angiographic follow-up (n, %)

   

0.241

 Complete occlusion

65 (80.2)

35 (85.4)

30 (75.0)

 

 Incomplete occlusion

16 (19.8)

6 (14.6)

10 (25.0)

 

Clinical follow-up time (month, mean ± SD)

25 ± 10.3

23.8 ± 12.5

26.4 ± 7.1

0.196

Clinical outcome (n, %)

   

0.954

 Favorable outcome

103 (96.3)

53 (96.4)

50 (96.2)

 

 Unfavorable outcome

4 (3.7)

2 (3.6)

2 (3.8)

 
  1. FD Flow diverter, PED Pipeline embolization device, TFD Tubridge flow diverter, SD Standard deviation