The relationship between mobile phone use and risk of brain tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of trails in the last decade

Leng, Lige

doi:10.1186/s41016-016-0059-y

Table 2 Summary of studies on mobile phone use and different kinds of brain tumor (glioma, meningioma, acoustic neuroma, pituitary adenoma)

From: The relationship between mobile phone use and risk of brain tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of trails in the last decade

Study	Period covered	Study type	Age (years)	No.of cases	OR (95 % CI)
Glioma
Takebayashi et al., 2008, [30] Japan [7]	2000–2004	Case–control	30–69	322	1.22 (0.63–2.37)
The INTERPHONE Study Group,2010, [16] 13countries [9]	2000–2004	Case–control	30–69	1078	glioma 0.81 (0.70–0.94)
Frei et al.,2011, [11] Danish [10]	1990–2007	cohort	≥30	356	1.04 (0.85 - 1.26) in men and 1.04 (0.56 -1.95) in women
Deltour et al., 2009, [9] 4 countries [11]	1974–2003	cohort	20–79	5390	1.05 (0.98-1.08) among men and 1.02 (1.01-1.05) among women
Schüz (b) et al., 2006, [26, 27] Germany [12]	2000–2003	Case–control	30–69	257	0.98 (0.74-1.29) ≥10 years, 2.20, (0.94-5.11)
Carlberg et al., 2014, [8] Sweden [17]	1997–2003 and 2007–2009	case-case analyses	18–75	1678	>20 years 1.7 (1.2–2.3); astrocytoma grade IV Mobile phone use 2.0 (1.4-2.9); cordless phone use 3.4 (1.04-11)
Mild et al.,2007, [23] Sweden [18]	1997–2003	Case–control	18–75	905	>10 years, grade I-II 1.6 (0.6-4.1) grade III-IV 2.7 (1.8-4.2)
Benson et al., 2013, [2] UK [23]	1999–2005 and again in 2009	cohort	middle-aged women	571	0.78, (0.55–1.10),
Cardis et al., 2011, [5] five interphone countries [24]	2000–2004	Case–control	30–59	553	0.93 (0.73 to 1.18)
Meningioma
Takebayashi et al., 2008, [30] Japan [7]	2000–2004	Case–control	30–69	322	0.70 (0.42–1.16)
The INTERPHONE Study Group,2010, [16] 13 countries [9]	2000–2004	Case–control	30–69	1147	0.79; (0.68–0.91)
Frei et al.,2011, [11] Danish [10]	1990–2007	cohort	≥30	80	≥10 years, 0.90 (0.57 to 1.42) in men and 0.93 (0.46- 1.87) in women
Deltour et al., 2009, [9] 4 countries [11]	1974–2003	cohort	20–79	3175	1.08 (0.96-1.13) among men, and 1.38 (1.32-1.44) among women
Schüz (b) et al., 2006, [26, 27] Germany [12]	2000–2003	Case–control	30–69	381	0.84 (0.62-1.13) ≥10 years, 1.09 (0.35-3.37)
Benson et al., 2013, [2] UK [23]	1999–2005 and again in 2009.	cohort	middle-aged women	251	0.78, (0.55–1.10)
Cardis et al., 2011, [5] five interphone countries [24]	2000–2004	Case–control	30–59	676	0.80 (0.66 to 0.96)
Mild et al.,2007, [23] Sweden [18]	1997–2003	Case–control	18–75	759	1.3, (0.5-3.2)
Acoustic Neuroma
Benson et al., 2013, [2] UK [23]	1999–2005 and again in 2009	cohort	middle-aged women	96	2.46 (1.07–5.64)
Pituitary adenoma
Takebayashi et al., 2008, [30] Japan [7]	2000–2004	Case–control	30–69	110	0.90 (0.50–1.61)

Back to article page

ISSN: 2057-4967

Contact us

Submission enquiries: Access here and click Contact Us
General enquiries: info@biomedcentral.com

Chinese Neurosurgical Journal

Contact us