Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic, treatment, and follow-up data for each of the patients

From: Perforator preservation technologies (PPT) based on a new neuro-interventional classification in endovascular treatment of perforator involving aneurysms (piANs)

Demographics

Aneurysm characteristics

Aneurysm state

Treatment

Post-op angiographic result

Follow-up

Complications

Patient no.

Age

Gender

Size (mm)

Location

Perforating artery involving

Type

Rupture or not

Fisher’s grade

Technique type

Material used

Degree of aneurysm tamping

Protection of PA

Time

Angiographic result

Infarction

Repeat SAH

1

47

F

4.14×4.52

N:2.5

LC7

Anterior choroidal artery

IIa

Yes

2

LVIS

4.5*20

Coils

36.5cm

Satisfy

Yes

29M

Satisfy

No

No

2

43

M

10.0×10.8

N:10.0

BA bifurcation

BA perforating branches

IIb

Yes

1

Enterprise

4.5*28

Coils

181cm

Satisfy

Yes

26M

Satisfy

No

No

3

54

F

6.0×5.0

N:6.0

BA bifurcation

BA perforating branches

IIb

No

0

Enterprise

4.5*28

Coils

63cm

Satisfy

Yes

18M

Satisfy

No

No

4

54

F

2.0×3.3

N:1.41

Lenticulostriate arteries

Lenticulostriate arteries

I

No

0

LVIS

4.5*20

LVIS Jr

2.5*17

Coils

10cm

Satisfy

Yes

50M

Satisfy

No

No

5

66

M

L:20

W:5

RM1

Lenticulostriate arteries

III

No

0

LVIS*2

3.5*20

3.5*15

Satisfy

Yes

34M

Satisfy

No

No

6

58

M

3.2×4.1

N:4.1

LC7

Anterior choroidal artery

IIa

No

0

LVIS

3.5*20

Coils

27.5cm

Satisfy

Yes

13M

Satisfy

TIA

No