Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic, treatment, and follow-up data for each of the patients

From: Perforator preservation technologies (PPT) based on a new neuro-interventional classification in endovascular treatment of perforator involving aneurysms (piANs)

Demographics Aneurysm characteristics Aneurysm state Treatment Post-op angiographic result Follow-up Complications
Patient no. Age Gender Size (mm) Location Perforating artery involving Type Rupture or not Fisher’s grade Technique type Material used Degree of aneurysm tamping Protection of PA Time Angiographic result Infarction Repeat SAH
1 47 F 4.14×4.52
N:2.5
LC7 Anterior choroidal artery IIa Yes 2 LVIS
4.5*20
Coils
36.5cm
Satisfy Yes 29M Satisfy No No
2 43 M 10.0×10.8
N:10.0
BA bifurcation BA perforating branches IIb Yes 1 Enterprise
4.5*28
Coils
181cm
Satisfy Yes 26M Satisfy No No
3 54 F 6.0×5.0
N:6.0
BA bifurcation BA perforating branches IIb No 0 Enterprise
4.5*28
Coils
63cm
Satisfy Yes 18M Satisfy No No
4 54 F 2.0×3.3
N:1.41
Lenticulostriate arteries Lenticulostriate arteries I No 0 LVIS
4.5*20
LVIS Jr
2.5*17
Coils
10cm
Satisfy Yes 50M Satisfy No No
5 66 M L:20
W:5
RM1 Lenticulostriate arteries III No 0 LVIS*2
3.5*20
3.5*15
Satisfy Yes 34M Satisfy No No
6 58 M 3.2×4.1
N:4.1
LC7 Anterior choroidal artery IIa No 0 LVIS
3.5*20
Coils
27.5cm
Satisfy Yes 13M Satisfy TIA No