Skip to main content

Table 3 Subgroup analysis of the recurrence rate in patients treated with DAs and surgery treatment

From: Are dopamine agonists still the first-choice treatment for prolactinoma in the era of endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

 

DAs

Surgery

Pooled result

Number of studies

Number of patients

Pooled result

Number of studies

Number of patients

Total

0.57 (0.48, 0.67)

19

835

0.19 (0.15, 0.24)

36

1215

Microprolactinoma

0.63 (0.49, 0.78)

7

380

0.10 (0.04, 0.17)

10

206

Macroprolactinoma

0.60 (0.39, 0.81)

6

226

0.34 (0.11, 0.56)

8

112

Giant prolactinoma

NAa

NAa

NAa

NAa

NAa

NAa

1980–1989

0.79

1

24

0.28 (0.16, 0.39)

13

374

1990–1999

0.81 (0.58, 1.04)

2

31

0.17 (− 0.01, 0.35)

3

149

2000–2009

0.51 (0.37, 0.65)

4

329

0.15 (0.09, 0.21)

6

278

2010–2019

0.54 (0.41, 0.67)

12

451

0.15 (0.09, 0.20)

14

414

Bromocriptine

0.86 (0.73, 0.98)

2

36

NAb

NAb

NAb

Cabergoline

0.55 (0.39, 0.70)

6

336

NAb

NAb

NAb

Microscopic surgery

NAb

NAb

NAb

0.13 (0.05, 0.21)

5

177

Endoscopic surgery

NAb

NAb

NAb

0.13 (0.05, 0.21)

3

75

  1. Das dopamine agonists, NAa not applicable, because the data was not provided by included studies, NAb not applicable, because the data was not discussed or calculated in the meta-analysis