Endoscopic surgery versus craniotomy in the treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 2 Main characteristics and quality assessment of the selected articles

Study (year)	Good recovery	Death	Follow-up	Outcome measurement	Quality score
	(NE/C)	(NE/C)
Nakano (2003) [14]	4/2	0/0	NA	GOS	5
Qiu (2003) [15]	18/13	2/NA	6	GOS	7
Cho (2006) [10]	NA	0/4	6	BI	6
Zhu (2011) [16]	7/3	2/5	3	GOS	7
Chi (2014) [17]	111/319	15/14	3-6	ADL	7
Zhang H (2014) [11]	11/4	0/3	6-20	GOS	5
Wang W (2015) [18]	NA	2/1	6-12	GOS	7
Yamashiro (2015) [19]	5/4	0/1	NA	mRS	6
Feng (2016) [12]	60/39	6/8	6	ADL	6
Cai (2017) [20]	NA	1/3	Discharge	GCS	7
Li Y (2017) [21]	NA	6/8	6	GOS	7
Xu (2017) [22]	30/11	15/18	6	mRS	7
Eroglu (2018) [23]	NA	2/4	6	GOS	7
Zhang J (2018) [13]	59/39	0/0	3	GOS	7

NE endoscopic surgery, C Craniotomy, RCT Randomized controlled trial, NA Not available, GOS Glasgow Outcome Scale, BI Barthel Index, ADL activities of daily living score, mRS modified Rankin Scale, GCS Glasgow Coma Scale
The Cochrane criteria and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of RCT and non-RCT, respectively

ISSN: 2057-4967