Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Outcome of patients with traumatic cranial nerve palsy admitted to a university hospital in Nepal

Chinese Neurosurgical Journal volume 10, Article number: 9 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cranial nerve palsy (CNP) is a common complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Despite a high incidence of TBI in Nepal (382 per 100,000), literature on the specific management and outcome of CNP is lacking. This study aimed to examine the outcomes of TBI patients involving single versus multiple CNP.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of 170 consecutive TBI patients admitted to the tertiary neurosurgical center in Nepal between April 2020 and April 2022 was conducted. Demographic, clinical, and etiological characteristics; imaging findings; and management strategies were recorded, compared, and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) was used to measure the outcomes in two groups of patients (single and multiple CNP) at 3 months.

Results

Out of 250 eligible patients, 80 were excluded and CNP was noted in 29 (17.1%) of the remaining 170. The median age was 34.9 years, and falls (60.6%) were the most common cause of trauma. TBI severity was categorized based on GCS: mild (82.4%), moderate (15.9%), and severe (1.8%). Cranial nerve involvement was seen in 29 (17.05%) patients: single cranial nerve involvement in 26 (89.65%) and multiple nerve involvement in 3 (10.34%). The most common isolated cranial nerve involved was the oculomotor nerve (37.9%). CT findings revealed a maximum of skull fractures with no significant association between CNP and CT findings.

Conclusions

CNP is a common consequence of TBI with the most common etiology being falls followed by RTA. Single CNP was more common than multiple CNP with no significant difference in the outcome in the 3-month GOSE score. Further research is needed to determine the burden of traumatic CNP and establish specific management guidelines for different types of CNP.

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a multifaceted condition that encompasses a wide range of injuries resulting from external physical trauma to the brain. It is one of the leading causes of death and disability in Nepal, with an estimated incidence of 382 per 100,000 individuals, which is higher than the global average of 351 per 100,000 [1]. It can manifest in various forms, ranging from mild, such as a concussion, to severe, potentially culminating in a state of coma or death [2]. The etiology of TBI is varied, with common causes including road traffic accidents (RTAs), falls, and physical assaults. Additionally, TBI is associated with cranial nerve palsy (CNP) in a significant proportion of cases, characterized by a diminution or total cessation of the functions of one or more cranial nerves.

The demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the outcomes of patients suffering from CNP in the context of TBI, have been well-documented in the extant literature [3, 4]. However, despite the high prevalence of TBI in Nepal, there exists a dearth of literature on the specific incidence and prognosis of CNP associated with TBI. To address this gap, this study aimed to conduct a retrospective review of TBI patients admitted to Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH), a tertiary care center in Nepal.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of 170 consecutive patients who sustained head trauma between April 12, 2020, and April 12, 2022, was conducted. Approval from the Institutional Review Committee (IRC) [Reference number: 488(6-11)e2078/079] was obtained before data collection. Patients who were lost to follow-up left against medical advice or had missing data were excluded from the study.

Patients were managed according to standard departmental protocols and Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines (fourth edition) [5] for moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. This included optimization of blood pressure and oxygenation, close neurological monitoring with prompt repeat head CT imaging for any decline ≥ 2 points on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). The study population was stratified into those with and without CNP. Management did not differ between these groups; no surgical interventions were undertaken specifically to address cranial nerve palsies. The adult version of the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) [6] was utilized to assess the outcomes for patients over 16 years old, while the pediatric version was used for those under 16 years old.

The analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel 365. The study employed descriptive statistics to summarize the demographic, clinical, and imaging factors as means, medians, and proportions.

Results

Out of 250 patients eligible to participate during the study period, 80 patients were excluded either due to missing data or loss to follow-up due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We elected not to recruit patients retrospectively from the pre-pandemic period to avoid introducing confounds from potentially different patient populations. Out of the remaining 170, CNP was noted in 29 (17.1%) patients.

Demographics

Of 170 patients, 124 (72.9%) were males, and 46 (27.05%) were females. The median age was 34.9 years ranging from 8 months to 88 years.

Etiology

Fall [103 (60.6%)] was the most common cause of trauma, followed by road traffic accidents (RTA) [43 (25.3%)], physical assault [14 (8.2%)], and other causes [9 (5.3%)].

Clinical presentations

Details of the patient’s demographic characteristics, mechanism of injury, GCS at the time of admission, clinical diagnosis, CT findings, and CNP and GOSE at a 3-month follow-up can be seen in Table 1. TBI severity was categorized based on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) as mild (GCS 13–15), moderate [7,8,9], or severe 3,4,5,6, 10, 11]. One hundred forty (82.4%) patients had mild TBI, 27 (15.9%) had moderate, and 3 (1.8%) had severe TBI. A non-reactive pupil was seen in 14 (8.23%) patients. Table 2 shows the neurological and non-neurological symptoms of TBI associated with CNP.

Table 1 Demographic, clinical characteristics, management, and outcome of patients with CNP
Full size table
Table 2 Symptomatology in CNP
Full size table

Cranial nerve palsies (CNP): single vs multiple

Cranial nerve involvement was seen in 29 patients, out of which single cranial nerve involvement was noted in 26 patients (89.65%) patients while 3 (10.34%) patients had multiple nerve involvement. As shown in Table 1, the most common isolated cranial nerve involved was oculomotor nerve 11 (37.9%) followed by the same proportion of facial 7 (24.1%) and optic nerve 7 (24.1%). Among the multiple CNP, optic and oculomotor nerves were simultaneously involved in 2 patients, and 1 patient had concurrent involvement of optic, oculomotor, and facial nerves.

CT scan findings

CT findings revealed a maximum of skull fractures 11 followed by EDH with 10 cases. There was no significant association between the type of CNP and the CT findings.

Management strategy

Surgical/operative intervention (evacuation of hematoma) was performed in 16 patients (55.17%) with CNP, while 13 (44.8%) patients underwent non-operative management through conservative measures (e.g., raised ICP management, use of steroids). The mean length of hospital stay was 13.86 days, and the mean duration of ICU stay was 4.41 days. Out of 26 single CNP, 12 (46.15%) were managed non-operatively, while the rest 14 (53.8%) underwent operative intervention. The most commonly involved single CNP viz. oculomotor nerve palsy was mostly managed operatively, 6 (54.54%), with the remaining 5 (45.45%) managed non-operatively. Two cases of multiple CNP (optic-oculomotor palsy and optic-oculomotor-facial palsy) were managed operatively with 1 case (optic-oculomotor palsy) managed non-operatively.

Outcome of isolated CNP vs multiple CNP

The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) was utilized to assess the 3-month post-treatment outcomes. Fig. 1 shows the outcome of both single and multiple CNP in the form of a chart. As per the figure, a single CNP had 3 deaths (GOSE score 1), 2 with oculomotor nerve involvement, and 1 with facial nerve involvement. It also had 11 upper good recoveries (GOSE score 8). Multiple CNP, however, had GOSE scores of 6 (upper moderate recovery), 7 (lower good recovery), and 8 (upper good recovery) in one patient each.

Fig. 1
figure 1

GOSE scale findings among CNP patients

Full size image

Discussion

CNP is one of the common consequences of TBI. The literature [10, 11] conducted across multiple countries has assessed its prevalence which ranges from 1 to 23%; however, it is not extensively studied in the context of a lower-middle country like Nepal. Single CNP is more common than multiple CNP [7]. Our study is the first of its kind that assesses the clinical characteristics, etiology, clinical presentations, CT scan findings, management strategy, and the pertinent difference in outcomes between single and multiple CNP in the largest neurosurgical tertiary care center in Nepal involving 170 patients with TBI.

Demographics

Almost one-third of patients sustaining TBI recorded in our center were males. The median age of TBI patients was middle-aged working adults concordant with other literature [8] with a very wide age range. Epidemiological studies indicate that men are 2.22 times more likely than women to sustain a TBI [8, 9]. The exact reason for this gender propensity is not yet fully understood [12]. However, some studies suggest that hormonal and biological variations [9] such as increased testosterone in men leading to aggressive and higher risk-taking behavior may play a role [13].

Etiology

Our study found that fall was the most common cause of TBI, accounting for over half of the cases, followed by road traffic accidents. This distribution is similar to the findings from other studies globally [14, 15]. Falls are more likely to occur in elderly populations [16], which may have contributed to the predominance observed in our cohort. Analyses of injury severity patterns suggest RTAs are often more deadly than falls [17]. Thus, our hospital-based study could underestimate traffic-related cranial nerve injuries if less survivable cases were missed. However, road safety metrics have improved after Nepal adopted strict drunk driving policies in 2011 [17], leading to fewer alcohol-related severe and fatal injuries nationwide based on transport authority records. Concurrently, increased urban congestion may be precipitating more frequent mild road traffic injuries that do not present for care.

A subgroup analysis evaluated the association between injury mechanism and risk of TBI with or without concomitant CNP. Among 103 fall-related cases, 14 patients (13.6%) had CNP, while of 43 patients sustaining RTA, 6 (13.9%) developed CNP. The odds ratio for CNP was 0.969 when comparing fall and RTA etiologies, indicating no statistically significant difference for secondary nerve injury across the predominant mechanisms of injuries.

Clinical presentations

Upon categorizing the severity of TBI using the GCS scale [18], more than 80% of the hospitalized patients had mild TBI (GCS 14–15) with only a very few proportions of severe TBI (GCS < 8) which is similar to other literature [19]. TBI associated with CNP was seen in about one-fifth of patients out of which single cranial nerve involvement was the most common accounting for almost 90% of the cases. The literature on CNP following TBI gives a wide range (1 to 23%) [10, 11] of the estimated prevalence across the globe. However so, most of those studies were carried out in higher-income countries, and similar literature in the context of lower-middle-income countries is severely lacking, thus warranting further needs of research in this area.

The most common isolated cranial nerve involved was the oculomotor nerve followed by the facial nerve. Although isolated oculomotor nerve involvement in TBI is relatively rare in the case of mild TBI [20], severe TBI can occasionally result in it [20]. The hospitalized patient in our center had endured a higher proportion of mild TBI, but the isolated oculomotor nerve was seen to be the most commonly involved cranial nerve, which contrasts with other literature [20, 21]. The optic-oculomotor combination was the most commonly involved multiple cranial nerves in our study. A 2005 study, analyzed out of 979 cases [22], revealed the combination of oculomotor and abducens, trochlear and abducens, or trochlear and facial to be the most common variants among multiple CNP.

Ocular symptoms (RAPD, blurred vision, lagophthalmos, decreased visual acuity) were the most common neurological symptoms seen in CNP patients.

CT scan findings

The CT findings in our study revealed about 1/3rd of cases of skull fractures with one fracture of the skull base in the CNP patients. But the exact distinction between the type of CNP and the corresponding CT finding could not be established from our study. CT scans have been useful for assessing the fracture extension and intraosseous cranial nerve segment [23]. We could not identify any literature that compares the type of CNP with the CT findings and the correlation between the two. This necessitates more research in this field to establish the exact data regarding the same.

Management strategy

More than 50% of the hospitalized patients in our center underwent surgical exploration (i.e., hematoma evacuation) for CNP rather than non-surgical intervention. Single CNP most commonly underwent hematoma evacuation. One study on the efficacy of surgical decompression together with evacuation of hematoma of post-traumatic facial nerve palsy showed a robust outcome for the patient after the procedure [24]. We could not find adequate literature that establishes a clear guideline for the definitive management of CNP. However, most of the literature suggests that prompt recognition, rapid resuscitation, and definitive operative management of the cases are of paramount importance to prevent secondary brain injuries [21]. At our center, most cranial nerve injuries were managed conservatively with favorable functional outcomes. Optic nerve injuries associated with severe brain injury were managed with steroids. However, there is an ongoing debate about whether or not steroid alters any management-related outcome [25, 26]. Further research is needed to establish the preferential mode of management.

In our center, oculomotor nerve injury, the most common CNP, was managed conservatively. About 3/4 of patients improved within 3 months, with only a few developing residual palsy not affecting their daily lives. Currently, a controversy prevails regarding the non-surgical vs surgical mode of management of traumatic oculomotor nerve [27, 28]. This too calls for more well-designed research studies for the establishment of clear management guidelines.

Our study involved a conservative approach with steroids for the management of facial nerve injuries. Although a complete recovery was noted in about 3/4th of the patients in our center within 3 months, the lack of establishment of a clear consensus in the management of facial nerve injuries via surgical or non-surgical approach remains a topic of further discussion [29].

Outcome of isolated CNP vs multiple CNP

GOSE scale [6] was used for comparison of outcomes between the two groups with single vs multiple CNP. The study shows that a GOSE score of 1 (death) was all seen with single CNP patients with upper good recovery seen in about 1/3 of cases. This does not clearly outline the outcome between the GOSE and the type of CNP involved. No papers establishing a distinct difference in outcome between single and multiple CNP could be identified, hence warranting more focus in this area in future studies as well.

The limitations of the study were small sample sizes and reliance on self-reported data. This indicates a need for larger, multi-centric studies with a control group and longitudinal follow-up to establish effective management protocols. Randomized controlled trials establishing the efficacy of current management protocols specific to Nepal are necessary. Overall, this study serves as a guide for future research and highlights the need for further investigation into traumatic CNP in the context of a lower-middle-income country like Nepal.

Limitations and future directions

Owing to the study being conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, the final sample size was smaller than originally planned due to missing data and loss to follow-up. We could not retrospectively enroll patients from the pre-pandemic period, which may have represented different patient demographics. However, we believe examining 29 patients with TBI and cranial nerve involvement out of 170 TBI patients provides perspective on the management and outcomes of this population in Nepal. The authors acknowledge the study’s limitations including the modest sample size and challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in intermittent government-enforced lockdowns and patients’ hesitancy to seek hospital visits unless in urgent situations, potentially impacting the completeness and accuracy of long-term data. Moreover, the 3-month patient follow-up was constrained by feasibility and the time-limited nature of the principal author-led analysis. Undoubtedly, the more extended follow-up would better delineate the functional recovery trajectories and outcomes of both single and multiple traumatic cranial neuropathies.

This paper intends to serve as a foundational basis for future expanded multi-center research aimed at accumulating larger sample sizes, comprehending national data trends, and shaping context-specific management guidelines. A more comprehensive prognostic model integrating additional predictors such as frailty status and longer follow-up periods would further enhance the paper’s strength.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that traumatic CNP is a significant complication following TBI, with the majority of patients with single nerve involvement. There was no significant difference in the outcomes between single and multiple CNP concerning clinical characteristics, etiology, CT findings, management protocols, and GOSE. Further research is needed to outline the exact burden of traumatic CNP and establish a clearer definite management guideline regarding the management of various types of CNP in our context.

Availability of data and materials

The data used in this study was collected from the Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH) medical record section. The raw data can be made available upon request to the corresponding author. Any further material necessary for the replication of this study can also be made available upon request.

Abbreviations

CNP:

Cranial nerve palsy

CT:

Computed tomography

EDH:

Epidural hematoma

GCS:

Glasgow coma scale

GOSE:

Glasgow outcome scale extended

ICH:

Intracerebral hemorrhage

ICU:

Intensive care unit

INGOs:

International non-governmental organizations

IRC:

Institutional Review Committee

NGOs:

Non-governmental organizations

RTAs:

Road traffic accidents

SAH:

Subarachnoid hemorrhage

SDH:

Subdural hematoma

TBI:

Traumatic brain injury

TUTH:

Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital

References

  1. Newall N, Gajuryal S, Bidari S, Karki A, Karki P, Bodkin P, et al. Epidemiology and pattern of traumatic brain injuries at Annapurna Neurological Institute & Allied Sciences, Kathmandu. Nepal World Neurosurg. 2020;141:413–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huckhagel T, Riedel C, Rohde V, and RLC neurology, 2022 undefined. Cranial nerve injuries in patients with moderate to severe head trauma–analysis of 91,196 patients from the TraumaRegister DGU® between 2008 and 2017. Elsevier [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 4]; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846721006181

  3. Kafle P, Khanal B, Yadav D, … DPBJ of H, 2019 undefined. Head injury in Nepal: an institutional based prospective study on clinical profile, management and early outcome of traumatic brain injury in eastern part of Nepal. nepjol.info [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 4]; Available from: https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/bjhs/article/view/25459

  4. Newall N, Gajuryal S, Bidari S, Karki A, neurosurgery PKW, 2020 undefined. Epidemiology and pattern of traumatic brain injuries at Annapurna Neurological Institute & Allied Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. Elsevier [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 4]; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875020309657

  5. Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GWJ, Bell MJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, fourth edition. Neurosurg [Internet]. 2017 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Mar 4];80(1):6–15. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27654000/

  6. Wilson L, Boase K, Nelson LD, Temkin NR, Giacino JT, Markowitz AJ, et al. A manual for the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Interview. J Neurotrauma [Internet]. 2021 Sep 1 [cited 2023 Mar 13];38(17):2435–46. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33740873/

  7. Coello AF, Canals AG, Gonzalez JM, Martín JJA. Cranial nerve injury after minor head trauma: clinical article. J Neurosurg [Internet]. 2010 Sep 1 [cited 2023 Mar 16];113(3):547–55. Available from: https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg/113/3/article-p547.xml

  8. Report to Congress: Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States | Concussion | Traumatic Brain Injury | CDC Injury Center [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 16]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/pubs/tbi_report_to_congress.html

  9. Biegon A. Considering biological sex in traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol [Internet]. 2021 Feb 10 [cited 2023 Mar 16];12:576366. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7902907/

  10. Huckhagel T, Riedel C, Rohde V, and RLC neurology, 2022 undefined. Cranial nerve injuries in patients with moderate to severe head trauma–analysis of 91,196 patients from the TraumaRegister DGU® between 2008 and 2017. Elsevier [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 16]; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846721006181

  11. Basheer N, Varghese JC, Kuruvilla R, Alappat JP, Mathew J. A prospective study on the incidence and outcome of cranial nerve injuries in patients with traumatic brain injuries. Indian J Neurotrauma. 2021;18(01):45–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Traumatic brain injury: does gender matter? - CIHR [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 16]. Available from: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/49000.html

  13. McGlade E, Rogowska J, Yurgelun-Todd D. Sex differences in orbitofrontal connectivity in male and female veterans with TBI. Brain Imaging Behav. 2015;9(3):535–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. What causes traumatic brain injury (TBI)? | NICHD - Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 16]. Available from: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/tbi/conditioninfo/causes

  15. Get the Facts About TBI | Concussion | Traumatic Brain Injury | CDC Injury Center [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 16]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/get_the_facts.html

  16. Let’s Prevent Traumatic Brain Injury | Features | Injury Center | CDC [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 16]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/injury/features/traumatic-brain-injury/index.html

  17. Naresh SP, Shakya M. Policies and issues relating to speeding, drink and drug-impaired driving and road safety in Nepal.

  18. Mena JH, Sanchez AI, Rubiano AM, Peitzman AB, Sperry JL, Gutierrez MI, et al. Effect of the Modified Glasgow Coma Scale Score Criteria for mild traumatic brain injury on mortality prediction: comparing classic and Modified Glasgow Coma Scale Score Model scores of 13. J Trauma [Internet]. 2011 Nov [cited 2023 Mar 16];71(5):1185. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC3217203/

  19. Mild TBI and Concussion | Concussion | Traumatic Brain Injury | CDC Injury Center [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 16]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/concussion/index.html

  20. Kim T, Nam K, Kwon BS. Isolated oculomotor nerve palsy in mild traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil [Internet]. 2020 May 1 [cited 2023 Mar 16];99(5):430–5. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ajpmr/Fulltext/2020/05000/Isolated_Oculomotor_Nerve_Palsy_in_Mild_Traumatic.11.aspx

  21. Uberti M, Hasan S, Holmes D, Ganau M, Uff C. Clinical significance of isolated third cranial nerve palsy in traumatic brain injury: a detailed description of four different mechanisms of injury through the analysis of our case series and review of the literature. Emerg Med Int [Internet]. 2021 Apr 23 [cited 2023 Mar 16];2021:1–6. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC8087465/

  22. Keane JR. Multiple cranial nerve palsies: analysis of 979 cases. Arch Neurol [Internet]. 2005 Nov 1 [cited 2023 Mar 16];62(11):1714–7. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/789815

  23. Romano N, Federici M, Castaldi A. Imaging of cranial nerves: a pictorial overview. Insights Imaging [Internet]. 2019 Dec 1 [cited 2023 Mar 16];10(1):1–21. Available from: https://insightsimaging.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13244-019-0719-5

  24. Marszał BDEF J, Bartochowska ADEF A, Gawęcki BDE W, Wierzbicka MA, Małgorzata Wierzbicka prof. Efficacy of surgical treatment in patients with post-traumatic facial nerve palsy. Polish Journal of Otolaryngology [Internet]. 2021 Feb 16 [cited 2023 Mar 16];75(4):1–6. Available from: https://otolaryngologypl.com/gicid/01.3001.0014.7446

  25. Saxena R, Singh D, Menon V. Controversies in neuro-ophthalmology: steroid therapy for traumatic optic neuropathy. Indian J Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2014 Oct 1 [cited 2023 Mar 16];62(10):1028–30. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ijo/Fulltext/2014/62100/Controversies_in_neuro_ophthalmology__Steroid.15.aspx

  26. Yu-Wai-Man P, Griffiths PG. Steroids for traumatic optic neuropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(6)

  27. Singh A, Bahuguna C, Nagpal R, Kumar B. Surgical management of third nerve palsy. Oman J Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2016 Jun 1 [cited 2023 Mar 16];9(2):80. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC4932800/

  28. Gaillard F, Sharma R. Nothnagel syndrome. Radiopaedia.org [Internet]. 2017 Jul 2 [cited 2023 Mar 16]; Available from: http://radiopaedia.org/articles/54279

  29. Finsterer J. Management of peripheral facial nerve palsy. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology [Internet]. 2008 Jul 27 [cited 2023 Mar 16];265(7):743–52. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00405-008-0646-4

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Mr. Deepak Raj Joshi, the biostatistician at the Department of Research, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH), who assisted us in the statistical analysis of the paper.

Funding

The study was self-funded by the authors and did not receive any financial support from international non-governmental organizations (INGOs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), or public or private institutions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Khusbu Kumari, Naveen Gautam & Monika Parajuli

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Amit Pradhananga, Gopal Sedai, Sushil Shilpakar & Mohan Raj Sharma

  3. Department of Research, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Shreejana Singh

Authors
  1. Khusbu Kumari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Naveen Gautam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Monika Parajuli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shreejana Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amit Pradhananga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gopal Sedai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sushil Shilpakar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mohan Raj Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KK collected the data, performed the data entry, conducted the statistical interpretation, and contributed to the results and discussion. MP contributed to the data collection and data entry. NG performed the data editing, statistical analysis, and interpretation and contributed to the writing of the results and discussion. SS provided guidance on data interpretation, result writing, and statistical analysis. AP contributed to the data interpretation and critically appraised the results and discussion. GS provided guidance on data interpretation, result writing, and statistical analysis. SS contributed to the data interpretation, result writing, and statistical guidance. MRS conducted the data analysis and interpretation and critically appraised the results and discussion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naveen Gautam.

Ethics declarations

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Since the research was retrospective with the use of hospital-collected data without the use of any identifiable individual details, images, or videos, the “consent for publication” is not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumari, K., Gautam, N., Parajuli, M. et al. Outcome of patients with traumatic cranial nerve palsy admitted to a university hospital in Nepal. Chin Neurosurg Jl 10, 9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-024-00361-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-024-00361-8

Keywords

Chinese Neurosurgical Journal

ISSN: 2057-4967

Contact us