Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

Role of matrix Metalloproteinases in pituitary adenoma invasion

Chinese Neurosurgical Journal20184:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-017-0109-0

©  The Author(s) 2018

  • Received: 27 July 2017
  • Accepted: 13 December 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Though pituitary adenomas are benign tumors in most cases, a considerable fraction of PAs behave in a malignant-like manner and invade to the adjacent structures in sellar region, especially the cavernous sinuses. Cancer-cell invasion and metastasis remain a great challenge for physicians and surgeons in spite of emerging advances in drug therapy and surgical Treatment. matrix metalloproteinases, as a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases, have long been known to be associated with tumor invasion and metastasis mainly via breaking down basement membrane in different tissues. Aberrant expression and activation of matrix metalloproteinases have been detected in invasive pituitary adenomas as in malignancy and correlated to tumor invasion. Therefore, matrix metalloproteinases are considered as promising biomarkers for predicting tumor behavior and even drug targets for novel therapeutic strategies. In this review, we give an overview of the expression, function, regulation and clinical prospects of matrix metalloproteinases, especially focusing on the biological network in which matrix metalloproteinases may be abnormally activated in promoting pituitary adenoma invasion.

Keywords

  • Pituitary adenoma
  • Matrix metalloproteinase
  • Tumor invasion
  • Molecular biology

Background

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are the second most common intracranial neoplasms with the prevalence of around 80/100,000, representing up to 25% of brain tumors [1–3]. Though PAs are commonly benign tumors, a considerable fraction of PAs, with the prevalence of 43% radiographically and 18% intraoperatively, behave in a malignant-like manner and invade to the adjacent structures including cavernous sinuses (CSs) and even internal carotid arteries [4, 5]. Though the magnetic resonance imaging-based Knosp grading system shows acceptable reliability and prognostic value [6–8], intraoperative visualization remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of invasive PA. Thus, preoperative detection of invasive PAs is of great significance for making appropriate surgical strategies.

PA invasion is the most common cause of incomplete surgical resection demanding further imaging follow-up, radiotherapy and even chemotherapy. Intraoperative findings of invasion to adjacent structures remain the gold standard in diagnosing PA invasion, whereas classification systems based on radiographic results are important predicting tools prior to surgery. In the present review, studies adopting intraoperative and radiographic standards are comprehensively reviewed. PA invasion stays a great challenge for most neurosurgeons though rich-experienced pituitary centers with the assistance of multiple surgical techniques can achieve gross total resection with a rate of up to 63.5% [9]. More tools are needed to assist the detection of PA invasion at an early stage. Taken together, there are challenges in early detection and effective therapy of PA invasion, whereas the mechanism remains poorly understood and requires further exploration. Accordingly, various biological molecules have been screened in order to discover a biological marker of relatively high sensitivity and specificity in predicting PA invasion.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), as zinc-dependent endopeptidases, consist of 24 members in mammals and mainly function by degrading the structural tissue components in extracellular matrix (ECM) [10]. MMPs are found at high levels of protein and transcription in various types of tumor. Previous researches have demonstrated that MMPs are associated with tumor invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis [11]. Aberrant expression and activation of MMPs are detected in invasive PAs, suggesting the potential role of MMPs in promoting PA invasion via its proteolytic activity [12, 13]. Emerging evidence suggests that MMPs are implicated in the infiltrative growth of PAs. In this review, we will summarize expression, function, regulation and clinical prospects of MMPs for a better understanding of PA invasion.

Molecular basis of PA invasion

The medial wall (MW) of CS, which is located in the lateral side of pituitary gland, is penetrated by invasive PAs. The mainstream view is that MW of CS mainly consists of two distinct layers including pituitary capsule (PC) and dura mater (DM). The existence of histologic defect in MW of CS enabling PA invasion has been denied anatomic researches. Instead, the interaction between MW components and biological properties of PAs are believed to account for invasion. Peker et al. [14] was the first to investigate the collagen expression pattern of ECM in sellar region. They found that PC and DM share collagen I and II expressions in common while collagen III, IV and V are differentially located in PC alone. Knappe et al. [15] revealed a relatively different expression pattern of collagen in perisellar ECM but also certified the fact that collagen IV is densely expressed in PC. In contrast, Kawamoto et al. [13] demonstrated that collagen IV is the main functional component of DM in PAs, and therefore proposed that type IV collagenases are involved in PA invasion. Different from previous studies, Ceylan et al. [16] defined MW and PC as two distinct membrane structures and found high concentrations of collagen IV in both membranes. Though results of these studies concerning anatomic structures and collagen expressions of MW are slightly controversial, these findings all point out that collagen IV is the key component of ECM in MW of CS which may be activated by type IV collagenase, such as MMP-9 and MMP-2, in PA invasion.

MMPs function in PA invasion

Proteolysis

The destruction of integrity of ECM by proteolysis is considered as the main underlying mechanism of invasion in tumor behavior. Proteolytic activation of MMPs from a latent to an active form is regulated in a biochemical procedure termed as cysteine-switch in which a cysteine residue in the pro-domain compounding to zinc-binding region is removed to unmask the proteolytic site [17, 18]. Kawamoto et al. [12, 13] were the first to put forward the thesis that collagen IV is the main functional component of DM in PAs, and further discovered that immunohistochemical staining with MMP-9, a type IV collagenase, is strongly positive in invasive PAs but negative in noninvasive ones, associating MMP-9 and CS invasion. This series of great groundbreaking value first introduced the concept of MMP-induced invasion to PA invasion researches. In addition, MMP-2, known as another gelatinase of MMP family except for MMP-9, is also associated with tumor invasion in PAs [19, 20].

Angiogenesis

Angiogenesis is a key biologic factor involved in tumor proliferation, growth, invasiveness, and other cellular processes. MMPs play a vital role in angiogenesis and PA invasion [21]. Jugenburg et al. [22] performed a quantitative morphologic study to disclose the vascular supply of PAs by measuring percentages of capillary area, number of vessels per field, percentage of endothelial cells and numbers of endothelial cells per field. They found that the vascular density is lower in PAs than in normal pituitary tissues, and is almost the same between invasive and noninvasive PAs. In contrast, Turner et al. [23] detected higher vascular density in invasive macroprolactinoma compared with noninvasive macroprolactinoma, suggesting the potential role of microvessels in PA invasion. The relationship between angiogenesis and PA invasion still remains conflicting.

However, MMP-9 overexpression and angiogenesis are positively correlated in invasive PAs though the mechanism remains unclear. Turner et al. [24] explored the role of MMP-9 in regulating tumor behavior of PAs, and they found MMP-9 overexpression in invasive macroprolactinomas compared with noninvasive ones. Based on their previous studies, they further figured out the positive correlation between MMP-9 and angiogenesis in tumor invasiveness [23, 24]. Pan et al. [25] also revealed higher vascular density in invasive PAs than in noninvasive ones and established the positive correlation between MMP-9 and angiogenesis.

Furthermore, increased expression of MMP-14 is observed at mRNA and protein levels in invasive PAs [26, 27]. Hui et al. [27] tried to explain the underlying mechanism by which MMP-14 contributes to PA invasion via silencing MMP-14 gene in ATT20 cell lines. They demonstrated that the downregulation of MMP-14 is accompanied by suppressed expressions of PTTG, VEGF and TGF-β which participate in angiogenesis in both physiological and pathological conditions. They concluded that MMP-14 expression is likely to be upregulated by increased PTTG expression, resulting in higher VEGF expression and subsequent angiogenesis-mediated PA invasion [27].

Dysregulation of MMPs in invasive PAs

Protein kinase

Protein kinase C (PKC) is a family of protein kinase enzymes playing important roles in cellular signal transduction. PKC system-dependent MMP-2 and MMP-9 upregulations are associated with invasion and metastasis in different kinds of tumors. Aberrant expressions of MMP-2 and MMP-9 induced by PKC-related signaling pathways are found to promote invasion in glioma, breast cancer, melanoma, gastric cancer, colon cancer, hepatocellular cancer and et al. [28–34]. Previous studies have found significantly higher activity and expression of PKC in PAs than normal pituitary tissues as well as distinctive overexpression of PKC in invasive PAs compared with noninvasive ones [35, 36]. Furthermore, a single point mutation of PKC-α termed as D294G is screened out and confirmed in PAs with more invasive phenotypes, indicating the pivotal role of PKC in PA invasion [37, 38]. In nonfunctioning PAs and HP75 cell lines, Hussaini et al. [39] observed higher expression and activity of MMP-9 and detailed the role of PKC, especially its isoenzymes (PKC-α and PKC-δ) in elevating MMP-9 expression and activity. Addition of phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) can activate PKC and result in increased MMP-9 expression. PKC inhibitors and gene silencing can block PA invasion induced by PMA-mediated MMP-9 overexpression. Hence, they proposed the combination of MMP-9 and PKC inhibitors as novel strategies for treating invasive PAs [39].

Receptor tyrosine kinase

The discoidin domain receptors (DDRs) are unique receptor tyrosine kinases characterized by binding collagens as ligands [40]. Cell-collagen interaction is activated by DDRs in regulating cancer cell behavior. DDRs consist of two distinct subtypes, DDR1 and DDR2. Yoshida et al. [41] investigated the expression and function of DDR1 in HP-75 cell lines by clone transfection and gene silencing. They revealed that PA invasion is enhanced by the binding of DDR1-collagen I which elevates the cellular secretion of MMP-2 and MMP-9. A further research demonstrated that hypoxia increases the expression of DDR1 at mRNA and protein levels [42]. It is also confirmed that hypoxia-associated overexpression of DDR1 enhances the secretion of MMP-2 and MMP-9 and promotes PA invasion [42].

Cytokine

Emerging evidence has demonstrated the promoting role of inflammatory interleukin 17 (IL-17) and IL-17 receptors (IL-17R) in cancer invasion and metastasis, suggesting IL-17/IL-17R as promising targets for cancer immunotherapy [43]. In contrast, the study concerning IL-17/IL-17R axis in PAs is limited due to the benign tumor behavior. Qiu et al. [44] performed a research detecting relatively higher expression of IL-17, IL-17R and MMP-9 at mRNA and protein levels and meanwhile found the positive correlation of MMP-9 with IL-17 and IL-17R, respectively. Serum IL-17 concentration is significantly higher in invasive PAs than in noninvasive ones, suggesting IL-17 as a biomarker for invasiveness prediction in PAs. These findings warrant a deeper exploration into the relation between IL-17/IL-17R axis and MMPs in invasive PAs. Previous immunohistochemical results showed weak expression of IL-6 in PAs and normal tissues and demonstrated no significant correlation between IL-6 and MMP-2 or MMP-9 [45]. However, integrative proteomics and transcriptomic data with bioinformatics analysis detected IL-6 as an activated upstream regulator in invasion of pituitary null cell adenomas [46]. Moreover, the data suggested that IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 pathway contributes to tumor invasion by elevating MMP-9 expressions [46].

Tumor suppressor gene

Hepatocellular carcinoma, downregulated 1 (HEPN-1) gene is a novel tumor suppressor gene first described in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Moh et al. [47] revealed that silenced HEPN-1 gene is frequent in HCC and that transfection of HEPN-1 gene into HepG2 cell lines exerts antineoplastic effect. In HCC, miRNA-21 can suppress HEPN-1 expression resulting in carcinogenesis [48]. In somatotroph PAs, HEPN-1 silencing is associated with aggressive tumor behavior and is found to promote invasiveness via upregulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in GH3 and GT1.1 cells [49]. Contradictorily, miRNA −21 is downregulated in corticotropinomas, suggesting its different biologic role in PAs compared with HCC [50].

Wnt signaling pathways

Previous studies have revealed that Wnt signaling pathways are critical for the development of pituitary gland and tumorigenesis of PAs [51]. Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways are termed as canonical signaling participating in transcription changes. Wnt-4 overexpression is observed in most PAs, and Wnt-4 excessive activation is inversely correlated to tumor invasion [52]. In β-catenin knockdown PA cells, reduced invasiveness and a drastic reduction of MMP-2/9 are detected simultaneously, suggesting that MMP-2/9-medicated PA invasion may be in the downstream of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [53].

Tissue inhibitor of MMPs

Tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs) are endogenous regulators of MMP function via binding specific sites of MMPs and therefore considered as potential inhibitors of PA invasion. TIMPs consist of 4 members in human, which are TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3 and TIMP-4. Beaulieu et al. observed an inverse correlation between TIMP-2 and TIMP-3 levels and tumor invasiveness. Sun et al. [54] revealed that expression of TIMP3 in mRNA and protein levels was negatively correlated with tumor invasiveness in Cushing disease. In prolactinomas, TIMP-2 was found to be a marker for tumor invasion and recurrence [55]. However, the mechanism of TIMPs and interaction between TIMPs and MMPs in PA invasion have not been clarified.

Taken together, MMPs regulation network has not been clarified (Fig. 1). We think that there may be following reasons: (i) There have been cushing’s disease dogs and prolactinoma rats used for imaging, surgery and drug studies [56–58]. However, animal models of different PA subtypes have not been stably established [58, 59], and alternative PA cell lines are easily affected by experimental conditions. (ii) tissue samples of human PAs are difficulty to collect in most research centers, and therefore molecular studies with large sample size are quite limited. (iii) Underlying mechanism of MMPs in promoting PA invasion may be not specific enough in nature leading to indefinable correlation between aberrant molecular expression and invasive behavior.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Schematic overview of function and regulation of MMP family members in PA invasion

Potential role of MMPs in diagnosing invasive PAs

In light of the positive association between MMPs and PA invasion, MMPs are recommended as promising biomarkers for detecting invasive PAs [20, 55, 60–62]. Among all the candidate biomarkers of MMPs, MMP-2 and MMP-9 are the most studied ones. Gong et al. [60] strongly recommended MMP-9 as a reliable biomarker for detecting invasive PAs and evaluating the extent of invasiveness. In their test, significant increased MMP-9 expression and activity are seen and certified in invasive PAs in contrast to noninvasive ones. Moreover, MMP-9 can distinguish the extent of invasiveness regardless of tumor types, size and status (primary or recurrent), paving the way of MMP-9 to clinical practice. Moreover, MMP-9 expression may be affected by dopamine agonist drugs in prolactinomas, indicating that MMP-9 can reflect the response to drugs [55]. Liu et al. [19] demonstrated that high MMP-2 mRNA and protein levels correlate with PA invasiveness without respect to tumor size and hormone secretion. They proposed MMP-2 as a powerful tool for distinguishing the invasive potential of PAs. These findings demonstrate the potential roles of MMP-9 and MMP-2 as biomarkers. However, there is no related study giving out the cut-off point, specificity and sensitivity of serum MMP-9 or MMP-2 concentrations in predicting PA invasion.

Conclusion

MMPs are considered as promising biomarkers and future drug targets contributing to early detection and improved prognosis of invasive PAs. The clinical value of MMPs in predicting PAs invasion is of great significance and worthy conducting a perspective study to correlate the blood levels of MMPs and infiltrating tendency and extent of PAs. Taken together, further studies, in terms of both molecular biology and clinical evidence, are warranted to elucidate the role of MMPs in invasive PAs.

Abbreviations

CS: 

Cavernous sinus

DDR: 

Discoidin domain receptor

DM: 

Dura mater

ECM: 

Extracellular matrix

HCC: 

Human hepatocellular carcinoma

HEPN-1: 

Hepatocellular carcinoma, downregulated 1

IL: 

Interleukin

MMP: 

Matrix metalloproteinase

MW: 

Medial wall

PA: 

Pituitary adenoma

PC: 

Pituitary capsule

PKC: 

Protein kinase C

PMA: 

Phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate

TIMP: 

Tissue inhibitors of MMP

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Xiaohai Liu for excellent technical assistance in the final preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

There is no funding for this review.

Availability of data and materials

This paper is a review article. Referred literature in this paper has been listed in the references part. The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available online by searching the PubMed. Some original points in this article come from the laboratory practice in our research centers and the authors’ experiences.

Author’s contributions

The authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and write-up of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China

References

  1. Fernandez A, Karavitaki N, Wass JA. Prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a community-based, cross-sectional study in Banbury (Oxfordshire, UK). Clin Endocrinol. 2010;72(3):377–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Asa SL, Ezzat S. The pathogenesis of pituitary tumors. Annu Rev Pathol. 2009;4:97–126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fontana E, Gaillard R. Epidemiology of pituitary adenoma: results of the first Swiss study. Rev Med Suisse. 2009;5(223):2172–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dhandapani S, Singh H, Negm HM, Cohen S, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Cavernous sinus invasion in pituitary adenomas: systematic review and pooled data meta-analysis of radiologic criteria and comparison of endoscopic and microscopic surgery. World Neurosurg. 2016;96:36–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dai C, Feng M, Liu X, et al. Refractory pituitary adenoma: a novel classification for pituitary tumors. Oncotarget. 2016;7(50):83657–68.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Micko AS, Wohrer A, Wolfsberger S, Knosp E. Invasion of the cavernous sinus space in pituitary adenomas: endoscopic verification and its correlation with an MRI-based classification. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(4):803–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mooney MA, Hardesty DA, Sheehy JP, et al. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the Knosp scale for pituitary adenoma grading. J Neurosurg. 2017;126:1714–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Juraschka K, Khan OH, Godoy BL, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to large and giant pituitary adenomas: institutional experience and predictors of extent of resection. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(1):75–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bao X, Deng K, Liu X, et al. Extended transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus using multiple complementary techniques. Pituitary. 2016;19(1):1–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Overall CM, Kleifeld O. Tumour microenvironment - opinion: validating matrix metalloproteinases as drug targets and anti-targets for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(3):227–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wieczorek E, Jablonska E, Wasowicz W, Reszka E. Matrix metalloproteinases and genetic mouse models in cancer research: a mini-review. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(1):163–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kawamoto H, Kawamoto K, Mizoue T, Uozumi T, Arita K, Kurisu K. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 secretion by human pituitary adenomas detected by cell immunoblot analysis. Acta Neurochir. 1996;138(12):1442–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kawamoto H, Uozumi T, Kawamoto K, Arita K, Yano T, Hirohata T. Type IV collagenase activity and cavernous sinus invasion in human pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir. 1996;138(4):390–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Peker S, Kurtkaya-Yapicier O, Kilic T, Pamir MN. Microsurgical anatomy of the lateral walls of the pituitary fossa. Acta Neurochir. 2005;147(6):641–8. discussion 649View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Knappe UJ, Fink T, Fisseler-Eckhoff A, Schoenmayr R. Expression of extracellular matrix-proteins in perisellar connective tissue and dura mater. Acta Neurochir. 2010;152(2):345–53. discussion 353View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ceylan S, Anik I, Koc K, et al. Microsurgical anatomy of membranous layers of the pituitary gland and the expression of extracellular matrix collagenous proteins. Acta Neurochir. 2011;153(12):2435–43. discussion 2443View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Wart HE, Birkedal-Hansen H. The cysteine switch: a principle of regulation of metalloproteinase activity with potential applicability to the entire matrix metalloproteinase gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(14):5578–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Springman EB, Angleton EL, Birkedal-Hansen H, Van Wart HE. Multiple modes of activation of latent human fibroblast collagenase: evidence for the role of a Cys73 active-site zinc complex in latency and a “cysteine switch” mechanism for activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(1):364–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu W, Kunishio K, Matsumoto Y, Okada M, Nagao S. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression correlates with cavernous sinus invasion in pituitary adenomas. J Clin Neurosci. 2005;12(7):791–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu W, Matsumoto Y, Okada M, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 2 and 9 expression correlated with cavernous sinus invasion of pituitary adenomas. J Med Invest. 2005;52(3–4):151–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gurlek A, Karavitaki N, Ansorge O, Wass JA. What are the markers of aggressiveness in prolactinomas? Changes in cell biology, extracellular matrix components, angiogenesis and genetics. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;156(2):143–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jugenburg M, Kovacs K, Stefaneanu L, Scheithauer BW. Vasculature in Nontumorous Hypophyses, pituitary adenomas, and carcinomas: a quantitative morphologic study. Endocr Pathol. 1995;6(2):115–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Turner HE, Nagy Z, Gatter KC, Esiri MM, Harris AL, Wass JA. Angiogenesis in pituitary adenomas - relationship to endocrine function, treatment and outcome. J Endocrinol. 2000;165(2):475–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Turner HE, Nagy Z, Esiri MM, Harris AL, Wass JA. Role of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in pituitary tumor behavior. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(8):2931–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pan LX, Chen ZP, Liu YS, Zhao JH. Magnetic resonance imaging and biological markers in pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space. J Neuro-Oncol. 2005;74(1):71–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang J, Voellger B, Benzel J, et al. Metalloproteinases ADAM12 and MMP-14 are associated with cavernous sinus invasion in pituitary adenomas. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(6):1327–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hui P, Xu X, Xu L, Hui G, Wu S, Lan Q. Expression of MMP14 in invasive pituitary adenomas: relationship to invasion and angiogenesis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(4):3556–67.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu TT, Hsieh YH, Hsieh YS, Liu JY. Reduction of PKC alpha decreases cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of human malignant hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cell Biochem. 2008;103(1):9–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Noh EM, Park YJ, Kim JM, et al. Fisetin regulates TPA-induced breast cell invasion by suppressing matrix metalloproteinase-9 activation via the PKC/ROS/MAPK pathways. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;764:79–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin CW, Shen SC, Chien CC, Yang LY, Shia LT, Chen YC. 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced invasion/migration of glioblastoma cells through activating PKCalpha/ERK/NF-kappaB-dependent MMP-9 expression. J Cell Physiol. 2010;225(2):472–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lai KC, Huang AC, Hsu SC, et al. Benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) inhibits migration and invasion of human colon cancer HT29 cells by inhibiting matrix metalloproteinase-2/−9 and urokinase plasminogen (uPA) through PKC and MAPK signaling pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(5):2935–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Halder K, Banerjee S, Ghosh S, et al. Mycobacterium Indicus pranii (mw) inhibits invasion by reducing matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-9) via AKT/ERK-1/2 and PKCalpha signalling: a potential candidate in melanoma cancer therapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2015;18:850–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Chandrika G, Natesh K, Ranade D, Chugh A, Shastry P. Suppression of the invasive potential of Glioblastoma cells by mTOR inhibitors involves modulation of NFkappaB and PKC-alpha signaling. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22455.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Akter H, Park M, Kwon OS, Song EJ, Park WS, Kang MJ. Activation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) by neurotensin promotes cell invasion and migration through ERK pathway in gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(8):6053–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Alvaro V, Touraine P, Raisman Vozari R, Bai-Grenier F, Birman P, Joubert D. Protein kinase C activity and expression in normal and adenomatous human pituitaries. Int J Cancer. 1992;50(5):724–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Couldwell WT, Law RE, Hinton DR, Gopalakrishna R, Yong VW, Weiss MH. Protein kinase C and growth regulation of pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1996;65:22–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhu Y, Dong Q, Tan BJ, Lim WG, Zhou S, Duan W. The PKCalpha-D294G mutant found in pituitary and thyroid tumors fails to transduce extracellular signals. Cancer Res. 2005;65(11):4520–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Alvaro V, Levy L, Dubray C, et al. Invasive human pituitary tumors express a point-mutated alpha-protein kinase-C. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77(5):1125–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hussaini IM, Trotter C, Zhao Y, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 is differentially expressed in nonfunctioning invasive and noninvasive pituitary adenomas and increases invasion in human pituitary adenoma cell line. Am J Pathol. 2007;170(1):356–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Vogel W, Gish GD, Alves F, Pawson T. The discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinases are activated by collagen. Mol Cell. 1997;1(1):13–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yoshida D, Teramoto A. Enhancement of pituitary adenoma cell invasion and adhesion is mediated by discoidin domain receptor-1. J Neuro-Oncol. 2007;82(1):29–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Li S, Zhang Z, Xue J, Guo X, Liang S, Liu A. Effect of hypoxia on DDR1 expression in pituitary adenomas. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:2433–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Fabre J, Giustiniani J, Garbar C, et al. Targeting the tumor microenvironment: the Protumor effects of IL-17 related to cancer type. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(9):1433.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Qiu L, He D, Fan X, et al. The expression of interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-17 receptor and MMP-9 in human pituitary adenomas. Pituitary. 2011;14(3):266–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Knappe UJ, Hagel C, Lisboa BW, Wilczak W, Ludecke DK, Saeger W. Expression of serine proteases and metalloproteinases in human pituitary adenomas and anterior pituitary lobe tissue. Acta Neuropathol. 2003;106(5):471–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Feng J, Yu SY, Li CZ, Li ZY, Zhang YZ. Integrative proteomics and transcriptomics revealed that activation of the IL-6R/JAK2/STAT3/MMP9 signaling pathway is correlated with invasion of pituitary null cell adenomas. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2016;436:195–203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Moh MC, Lee LH, Yang X, Shen S. HEPN1, a novel gene that is frequently down-regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma, suppresses cell growth and induces apoptosis in HepG2 cells. J Hepatol. 2003;39(4):580–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hu S, Tao R, Wang S, et al. MicroRNA-21 promotes cell proliferation in human hepatocellular carcinoma partly by targeting HEPN1. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(7):5467–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Peng H, Fan J, Wu J, et al. Silencing of HEPN1 is responsible for the aggressive biological behavior of pituitary somatotroph adenomas. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2013;31(2–3):379–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Amaral FC, Torres N, Saggioro F, et al. MicroRNAs differentially expressed in ACTH-secreting pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(1):320–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Chambers TJ, Giles A, Brabant G, Davis JR. Wnt signalling in pituitary development and tumorigenesis. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20(3):R101–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Li W, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Huang G, Zhang Q. Wnt4 is overexpressed in human pituitary adenomas and is associated with tumor invasion. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(1):137–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhao C, Zhang M, Liu W, Wang C, Zhang Q, Li W. Beta-catenin knockdown inhibits pituitary adenoma cell proliferation and invasion via interfering with AKT and gelatinases expression. Int J Oncol. 2015;46(4):1643–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sun B, Liu X, Yang Y, et al. The clinical utility of TIMP3 expression in ACTH-secreting pituitary tumor. J Mol Neurosci. 2016;58(1):137–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Gultekin GD, Cabuk B, Vural C, Ceylan S. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-2: prognostic biological markers in invasive prolactinomas. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22(8):1282–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Eljarmak D, Lis M, Cantin M, Carriere PD, Collu R. Effects of chronic bromocriptine treatment of an estrone-induced, prolactin-secreting rat pituitary adenoma. Horm Res. 1985;21(3):160–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. de Bruin C, Meij BP, Kooistra HS, Hanson JM, Lamberts SW, Hofland LJ. Cushing's disease in dogs and humans. Horm Res. 2009;71(Suppl 1):140–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Otto CA, Marshall JC, Lloyd RV, et al. Use of DES-treated rats as an animal model for assessment of pituitary adenoma imaging agents. Int J Rad Appl Instrum B. 1986;13(5):539–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Takekoshi S, Yasui Y, Inomoto C, Kitatani K, Nakamura N, Osamura RY. A Histopathological study of multi-hormone producing proliferative lesions in estrogen-induced rat pituitary Prolactinoma. Acta Histochem Cytochem. 2014;47(4):155–64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Gong J, Zhao Y, Abdel-Fattah R, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9, a potential biological marker in invasive pituitary adenomas. Pituitary. 2008;11(1):37–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Tomita T. Matrix Metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of Metalloproteinases in pituitary adenomas: possible markers of Neuroendocrine cells. Endocr Pathol. 1997;8(4):305–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Liu HY, Gu WJ, Wang CZ, Ji XJ, Mu YM. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 and -2 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-2 in invasive pituitary adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control trials. Medicine. 2016;95(24):e3904.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement

Chinese Neurosurgical Journal

ISSN: 2057-4967

Contact us