Skip to main content

Glioblastoma vaccine tumor therapy research progress

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignancy of the central nervous system in adults. The prognosis for late-stage glioblastoma (World Health Organization grade IV astrocytic glioma) is very poor. Novel treatment options are sought after and evaluated by clinicians and researchers, and remarkable advances have been made in surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. However, the treatment of glioblastoma remains extremely difficult and it can extend the lives of patients by only a few months. There has been notable progress in the field of immunotherapy, particularly with the use of tumor vaccines, for treating glioblastoma; especially peptide vaccines and cell-based vaccines such as dendritic cell vaccines and tumor cell vaccines. However, the results of the current clinical trials for vaccination are not satisfactory. This article reviews the progress in the development of vaccines for glioblastoma.

Background

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a primary central nervous system cancer with an annual incidence of approximately 3.19/100, 000, very poor prognosis, and a very short median survival time of approximately 14.6–16.6 months [1,2,3,4]. GBM is primarily treated through surgery to clear the pathological features, followed by radiotherapy and temozolomide azole synchronization amine chemotherapy, and finally, adjuvant chemotherapy. Limitations such as the heterogeneity of the tumor, the blood-brain barrier, and the immunosuppression of gliomas affect the efficacy of existing treatment regimens [5, 6]. Novel treatment strategies are explored and some progress has been made, such as in tumor immunotherapy, especially in vaccine therapy. Vaccine therapy is based on the tumor-specific immune response to the injected exogenous antigens. The introduction of foreign antigens to antigen-presenting cells induces and enhances the immunity of the host. The current clinical trials on vaccines for GBM are primarily peptide-based vaccines and cells of Phytophthora seedlings. This paper reviews the promising strategies of vaccine therapies for treating GBM.

Peptide vaccines

GBM is characterized by a large number of mutations; however, GBM due to mutation has a relatively low negative charge notorious [7]. The protein/peptide variants encoded from the mutated gene are unique to the tumor cells and not present in normal cells; therefore, they can be used as specific antigens for eliciting immune responses against tumor cells. These antigens are referred to as tumor-specific antigens (TSAs), earlier described as “neo-antigens”. Only a few mutations are processed into new epitopes; when presented by the antigen presenting cells in the human leukocyte antigen (human leukocyte the antigen, HLA) on presentation, these epitopes result in T cell-based immunity. Many potential tumor antigens do not originate from mutations, but from erroneous or overexpression of normal proteins that are also expressed in other tissues. In such cases, targeting the antigen may lead to autoimmunity, resulting in non-target effects such as brain inflammation [8]. The lack of specificity and high expression of epitopes in GBM are limiting factors in the development of peptide vaccine-based strategies.

Epidermal growth factor receptor type III mutant

Epidermal growth factor receptor III type mutant (Eggroll) remains the most relevant and undisputed TSA in GBM, found in 20–30% of the tumors. In the late 1990s, researchers designed a peptide vaccine against a TSA (CDX-110), to recognize and promote immune responses against the mutant sequences. CDX-110 has a good preclinical efficacy in mouse brain tumor models, in terms of inducing humoral and cytotoxic T cell responses [9]. Based on the results from early clinical data [10], a multi-center, dual-arm phase III clinical trial (ACT IV) was conducted, with 745 newly diagnosed GBM patients. Patients receiving rindopepimut exhibited a good humoral immune response, compared to the patient’s in the control group; however the median overall survival did not improve significantly [11]. Abnormally low cut-off values that are positive for Egeria affect the test results. In addition, researchers have developed a drug that targets Egeria (ADU-623) and a phase I clinical trial in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma, was conducted. However, the disappointing results from the clinical trial of a CTIV significantly slowed the development of the Egeria-targeting peptide vaccine.

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1

Mutation in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) does not occur in normal human cells; it occurs almost exclusively in tumor cells, making it a promising TSA [12]. Approximately 80% of low-grade gliomas have IDH mutations; among them, the R132H mutation in IDH1 rarely occurs in primary GBM. The presence of an IDH1 gene mutation indicates that the GBM is a secondary low-grade glioma. Peptides targeting R132H induce antigen-specific CD4+ T cells and humoral responses, following the appearance of MHC class II (lack of class I epitopes) [13]. Currently, phase I clinical trials of peptide vaccines targeting IDH1 R132H are ongoing.

Peptide vaccine

The mutation load of GBM is relatively low [7]; however, tumor heterogeneity remains an obstacle, especially for selective single-target therapy. Such treatment can be limited by antigen escape, where the tumor no longer expresses the target antigen [14]. Therefore, it is essential to develop a model that identifies and combines multiple novel antigens and predicts HLA presentation capabilities, which is a question of priorities. Two recently published key trials have highlighted the trend of personalized cancer vaccines against novel antigens [15, 16]. In the first study, a personalized cancer vaccine was developed against a novel antigen, identified through comparing the whole exon sequence data from the resected tumor and the matched normal tissues [16]. For each patient, 7 to 20 antigens that were predicted to have a high affinity for HLA type-I binding were chosen for vaccine development. The second study combined two novel antigens and non-mutated tumor-associated antigens to increase the number of binding epitopes [15]. Nine by the non-mutated peptides (APVAC1 patient) to a vaccine composition after injection, followed by the administration of 20 peptides of new antigens (APVAC 2). Both studies were phase I clinical trials; they could induce a considerable number of invasive tumor-reactive T memory cells and clonal expansion of antigen-specific cells.

Cell-based vaccines

There are two main cell-based antitumor vaccines: the tumor cell vaccine and dendritic cell (DC) vaccine.

Dendritic cell vaccine

The treatment of GBM vaccine clinical trials currently under way is the most clinically available DC vaccine clinical trial. DCs are the strongest antigen-presenting cells in humans; they induce innate immunity, acquired immunity, and enable immunity conversion. In addition, they also influence the immune responses of lymphocytes, differentiation, and antigen presentation [17]. DCs were discovered by Steinman in 1973; however, its key role in the immune response were established only in the early 1990s [18]. DC vaccine preparation and inoculation involves isolating the DCs from the patient, loading them with tumor antigens and treating them with the corresponding cytokines to induce maturity, and finally the preparation of human DC vaccines for re-injection into the patient [19]. This DC vaccine preparation process is a reasonable anti-tumor vaccine strategy, majorly because it formed the main body of silence-T; it is the first FDA-approved cancer vaccine. Sepulture-T is demonstrated to be clinically efficient in improving the median overall survival period in prostate cancer patients of 4 months [20]. For treating GBM with DC vaccine, DCs are isolated from the peripheral blood CD-14 positive monocytes and GM-CSF and IL-4 are used to induce the differentiation of immature DCs [21]. The tumor antigens (including polypeptide, RNA, DNA, and tumor lysates) are loaded into the immature DCs, which are then presented on MHCs, and the various cytokines (for example, of GM-CSF, of IL-.4, of TNF-α, and IL-6 under) action to maturity [21, 22]. The USA, Europe, and Japan have published a lot of respect for the use of DC vaccine therapy in glioma clinical research paper [23]. The Department of Neurosurgery in our hospital is also actively conducting a phase II clinical trial of a DC vaccine and found that the DC vaccine marginally improves the survival period of GBM patients [24]. However, there is still no clear evidence for testing the efficacy in a phase III clinical trial, and the production of vaccines is very expensive. Diva is a DC vaccine project developed by Northwest Biotherapeutics based on the research of Linda Lieu et al. [25]; it is presently in phase III clinical trials. The latest developments in DC vaccines include the pretreatment of vaccine sites. Dendritic cells carrying cytomegalovirus phosphoprotein 65 (pp65) RNA significantly improve lymph node homing and prolong the overall survival time, following the pretreatment of the vaccine site with tetanus/diphtheria antigens [26].

Tumor cell vaccine

Early vaccines often used killed or inactivated tumor cells, similar to that of antiviral vaccines. The success rate was relatively low; and therefore gene-editing tumor cells were initiated in the late 1980s, for expressing some immune-stimulating cytokines; granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) was most commonly used. Tumor cells secreting GM-CSF are evaluated for treating GBM [27]. Phase I clinical trials are completed using the latest generation of autologous tumor cells and allogeneic tumor cell lines secreting GM-CSF (K-562). The success of vaccination is influenced by the activation of T cells and anti-tumor immunity [28]. In addition, direct injection of formalin-fixed GBM as an antigen in treating GBM, is explored [29, 30]. The overall survival in a clinical trial evaluating DC vaccines in 24 GBM patients was 22.2 months [30].

Discussion

GBM is the most common type of brain tumor and deservedly one of the deadliest cancers. The average survival period is only 1 year and the 5-year survival rate is approximately 5% [31]. At present, maximal safe resection followed by CCRT and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide is regarded as the standard treatment in GBM [32]. However, it can prolong significantly the patients’ survival, rather than thoroughly cure GBM. In addition, GBM infiltrates the brain in its early stages and spreads quickly, with distant metastases occurring later, making it difficult to completely cure GBM by a single means. In addition, the blood-brain barrier is an effective barrier against bacterial-viral invasion of the brain, but it can also make it difficult or impossible for many therapeutic agents to reach the brain. As a result, no new drug has been approved for nearly three decades, and the only available drug for brain tumors is temozolomide. Even more unfortunately, glioblastoma has a high chance of recurrence [33], and once it does, treatment options are very limited and not very effective. From surgery, to modern chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, our means of fighting against the disease are constantly advancing. In recent years, immunotherapy for tumors has gradually become a hot topic, among which, vaccine therapy provides a new treatment option for GBM patients, and there are numerous reports on the correlation between immune response and clinical outcome of cancer patients after receiving vaccine therapy. The “tumor vaccine” has already achieved initial results in immunotherapy. The key to vaccine therapy is the selection of the target of immunotherapy, and also, how to reduce the toxicity of the vaccine is an issue that needs close attention. The improvement of vaccines for GBM and other cancers should be based on the maximum potential of anti-tumor immune cells, the local tolerance of the tumor to immune factors, and the minimization of potential side effects. To date, most GBM vaccines have used tumor lysates without characteristic autologous homologs as antigens. This requires that the method of vaccine preparation be tailored to the individual and that the risks arising from the inclusion of normal brain tissue components in the vaccine be assumed. Such vaccines may therefore induce severe, injurious immune responses against normal brain tissue in some animal models. To date, however, there have been no serious side effects caused by tumor lysates. Typical side effects from such immunization treatments include hypothermia, rash, and pain at the vaccination site. To avoid damage to normal tissues of the human brain, several research groups have turned to vaccine development with tumor-specific antigens.

Conclusion

The progress in developing vaccines for treating GBM is still limited. Limitations in the access to the central nervous system and the tumor due to restrictions on the choice of drug and route of immunization, heterogeneity of the tumors, low mutation negative charge, pose unique challenges. The current results from the clinical trials on vaccines for GBM are not very promising; however, with further optimization, they could develop into a unique therapeutic strategy with great potential. The investment in the research on vaccines for treating GBM needs to be improved.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Abbreviations

GBM:

Glioblastoma

TSAs:

Tumor-specific antigens

HLA:

Human leukocyte the antigen

IDH:

Isocitrate dehydrogenase

DC:

Dendritic cell

References

  1. Jiang T, Mao Y, Ma W, Mao Q, You Y, Yang X, et al. CGCG clinical practice guidelines for the management of adult diffuse gliomas. Cancer Lett. 2016;375(2):263–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2016.01.024.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Louis D, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stupp R, Mason W, van den Bent M, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):987–96. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilbert M, Wang M, Aldape K, et al. Dose-dense temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a randomized phase III clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(32):4085–91. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.49.6968.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Patel A, Tirosh I, Trombetta J, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science (New York, NY). 2014;344:1396–401.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Quail D, Bowman R, Akkari L, et al. The tumor microenvironment underlies acquired resistance to CSF-1R inhibition in gliomas. Science (New York, NY). 2016;352:aad3018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hodges T, Ott M, Xiu J, et al. Mutational burden, immune checkpoint expression, and mismatch repair in glioma: implications for immune checkpoint immunotherapy. Neuro-Oncology. 2017;19(8):1047–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox026.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bigner D, Pitts O, Wikstrand C. Induction of lethal experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in nonhuman primates and guinea pigs with human glioblastoma multiforme tissue. J Neurosurg. 1981;55(1):32–42. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1981.55.1.0032.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heimberger A, Crotty L, Archer G, Hess KR, Wikstrand CJ, Friedman AH, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor VIII peptide vaccination is efficacious against established intracerebral tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(11):4247–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schuster J, Lai R, Recht L, et al. A phase II, multicenter trial of rindopepimut (CDX-110) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: the ACT III study. Neuro-oncology. 2015;17(6):854–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou348.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Weller M, Butowski N, Tran D, et al. Rindopepimut with temozolomide for patients with newly diagnosed, EGFRvIII-expressing glioblastoma (ACT IV): a randomised, double-blind, international phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(10):1373–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30517-X.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yan H, Parsons D, Jin G, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(8):765–73. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0808710.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Schumacher T, Bunse L, Pusch S, Sahm F, Wiestler B, Quandt J, et al. A vaccine targeting mutant IDH1 induces antitumour immunity. Nature. 2014;512(7514):324–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13387.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sampson J, Heimberger A, Archer G, et al. Immunologic escape after prolonged progression-free survival with epidermal growth factor receptor variant III peptide vaccination in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(31):4722–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.28.6963.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hilf N, Kuttruff-Coqui S, Frenzel K, Bukur V, Stevanović S, Gouttefangeas C, et al. Actively personalized vaccination trial for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Nature. 2019;565(7738):240–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0810-y.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Keskin D, Anandappa A, Sun J, et al. Neoantigen vaccine generates intratumoral T cell responses in phase Ib glioblastoma trial. Nature. 2019;565(7738):234–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0792-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mildner A, Jung S. Development and function of dendritic cell subsets. Immunity. 2014;40(5):642–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2014.04.016.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinman R. The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Annu Rev Immunol. 1991;9(1):271–96. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.iy.09.040191.001415.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Palucka K, Banchereau J. Cancer immunotherapy via dendritic cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(4):265–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3258.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kantoff P, Higano C, Shore N, et al. Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(5):411–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1001294.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nair S, Archer G, Tedder T. Isolation and generation of human dendritic cells. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2012; Unit7.32.

  22. Strome S, Voss S, Wilcox R, Wakefield TL, Tamada K, Flies D, et al. Strategies for antigen loading of dendritic cells to enhance the antitumor immune response. Cancer Res. 2002;62(6):1884–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fecci P, Heimberger A, Sampson J. Immunotherapy for primary brain tumors: no longer a matter of privilege. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(22):5620–9. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0832.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yao Y, Luo F, Tang C, Chen D, Qin Z, Hua W, et al. Molecular subgroups and B7-H4 expression levels predict responses to dendritic cell vaccines in glioblastoma: an exploratory randomized phase II clinical trial. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2018;67(11):1777–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-018-2232-y.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liau L, Prins R, Kiertscher S, et al. Dendritic cell vaccination in glioblastoma patients induces systemic and intracranial T-cell responses modulated by the local central nervous system tumor microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(15):5515–25. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0464.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mitchell D, Batich K, Gunn M, et al. Tetanus toxoid and CCL3 improve dendritic cell vaccines in mice and glioblastoma patients. Nature. 2015;519(7543):366–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14320.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Parney I, Chang L, Farr-Jones M, Hao C, Smylie M, Petruk K. Technical hurdles in a pilot clinical trial of combined B7-2 and GM-CSF immunogene therapy for glioblastomas and melanomas. J Neurooncol. 2006;78(1):71–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-005-9058-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Curry W, Gorrepati R, Piesche M, et al. Vaccination with irradiated autologous tumor cells mixed with irradiated GM-K562 cells stimulates antitumor immunity and T lymphocyte activation in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(12):2885–96. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2163.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ishikawa E, Tsuboi K, Yamamoto T, Muroi A, Takano S, Enomoto T, et al. Clinical trial of autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine for glioblastoma multiforme patients. Cancer Sci. 2007;98(8):1226–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00518.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ishikawa E, Muragaki Y, Yamamoto T, Maruyama T, Tsuboi K, Ikuta S, et al. Phase I/IIa trial of fractionated radiotherapy, temozolomide, and autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(3):543–53. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.5.JNS132392.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Polikarpov D, Campbell D, McRobb L, et al. Near-infrared molecular imaging of glioblastoma by miltuximab-IRDye800CW as a potential tool for fluorescence-guided surgery. Cancers. 2020;12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040984.

  32. Dinevska M, Gazibegovic N, Morokoff A, et al. Inhibition of radiation and temozolomide-induced glioblastoma invadopodia activity using ion channel drugs. Cancers. 2020;12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102888.

  33. Ahmed S, Hasan M, Aschner M, et al. Therapeutic potential of marine peptides in glioblastoma: mechanistic insights. Cell Signal. 2021;110142:110142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.110142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This work was supported by Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology,Fujian Province (No. 2020Y9103) and Fujian Provincial Health Technology Project(No.2021QNA025).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TZ, CL, and HG prepared the first draft of the manuscript. YL and DK revised, edited, and checked the final version. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dezhi Kang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, T., Li, C., Ge, H. et al. Glioblastoma vaccine tumor therapy research progress. Chin Neurosurg Jl 8, 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-021-00269-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-021-00269-7

Keywords

  • Glioblastoma
  • Vaccine therapy
  • Immunotherapy
  • Tumor microenvironment
  • Review