- Letter to the Editor
- Open access
- Published:
The efficacy of surgery over stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of tumor-related trigeminal neuralgia
Chinese Neurosurgical Journal volume 10, Article number: 27 (2024)
Abstract
Tumor-related trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a deeply debilitating condition that severely impacts patient quality of life. Two principal treatment methods in use are open surgical resection of the causative tumor or the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). In this letter, we aim to evaluate the use of both treatment methods and highlight that in patients with commensurate anatomy, open surgical resection continues to provide greater rates of symptomatic relief, lower rates of recurrence, and complication compared to stereotactic radiosurgery.
Dear Editor,
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a debilitating condition, defined by chronic pain across the dermatome innervated by the trigeminal nerve. The pathophysiology of TN is multifaceted, though typically occurs due to trigeminal compression, resulting in severe neuropathic pain. Several mechanisms may cause trigeminal compression, allowing TN to be grouped into classic TN, secondary TN, and idiopathic TN, as per the International Headache Society [1]. Of these, perhaps the most treatable form is secondary TN, in which compression is caused by an underlying disease, commonly a neoplasm [1]. Several tumor types have been implicated, though it most often occurs secondary to trigeminal schwannomas, petroclival meningiomas, and cerebellopontine angle tumors [2]. Several treatment methods have been posited for secondary TN, though open surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the mainstays of treatment. Here, we will evaluate the utility of these two treatment methods and highlight the continued relevance of open surgical resection in the management of this challenging and debilitating condition.
Cerebellopontine angle tumors are commonly causative for secondary TN. Their treatment with open surgical resection against SRS has been evaluated by several recent studies. The findings of Neff et al., who compared outcomes of both procedures to treat patients with large, vestibular schwannomas, are of particular interest. In their retrospective study comparing outcomes at 30-month post-index procedure, they found that for patients receiving surgical resection, 58% reported improvements in symptoms of neuralgia and paresthesia, compared to 0% of patients undergoing SRS reporting improvement in these symptoms post-treatment (p < 0.05) [3]. Other researchers have also documented the risks associated with increased trigeminal pain following SRS compared to open surgical resection. In their study evaluating pain following SRS for the treatment of schwannomas and meningiomas, Park et al. found that half of patients treated for TN secondary to meningiomas had worsened symptoms following SRS [4].
The findings of Nugroho et al. are also striking. In their systematic review evaluating open surgery versus stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of tumor-related TN, 26 retrospective studies were compared with Nugroho et al. finding that in patients undergoing open surgery, 92.2% gained pain improvement, 2.8% were unchanged, and 4.5% had recurrence, though none of the patients had worsened outcomes [2]. In cases treated with r-targeted radiosurgery, the improvement rate was 79.1%, unchanged at 14.3%, recurrence at 26.5%, and worse symptoms rate after the intervention was 6.6% [2]. The contemporary findings of Nugroho et al. highlight that in patients with tumors appropriate for surgical resection, greater symptomatic improvement may be anticipated, with rates of recurrence comparable or lower than radiosurgery.
Tumor-related TN can be caused by a range of intracranial tumors. They can be grouped depending on whether they compress or encase the trigeminal nerve [2], which impacts on the preferred treatment method and how appropriate they are for surgical resection. Prior research has shown that for isolated, solitary tumors, surgery confers improved survival rates, though carries a greater risk of iatrogenic injury [5]. For complex tumors, like those encasing the trigeminal nerve, SRS, a noninvasive procedure, may pose a lower risk of iatrogenic injury. However, as observed by some researchers, SRS, while less invasive, carries a greater risk of symptoms worsening than surgical resection [2]. Several reasons have been postulated for the worsened trigeminal symptoms in patients who have undergone SRS. Typically, in patients treated with SRS, tumor size does not decrease, and, instead, patients often experience temporary enlargement of their tumor, which causes greater trigeminal compression and only exacerbates their trigeminal symptoms [6]. In addition, exposure of the trigeminal nerve to radiation, as occurs in SRS, can cause permanent damage trigeminal nerve fibers, potentially causing permanent worsening of trigeminal symptoms [7, 8].
Despite the limitations of stereotactic radiosurgery, there are several situations in which this treatment method is preferential to open surgical resection. Surgical resection is associated with an increased rate of postoperative facial hypesthesia, due to iatrogenic injury to the trigeminal nerve intraoperatively [2], and this complication is unique to surgical resection, and in instances where tumor anatomy makes trigeminal nerve damage due to iatrogenic injury likely, SRS may be a superior treatment method. Radiosurgery is well documented as the least invasive surgical procedure for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia and has been associated with relatively low rates of facial paresthesia’s after treatment and low recurrence in patients achieving full symptomatic relief [9]. Tumor size, overall patient health, and patient preferences are also factors that should be considered when deciding on surgery vs SRS. Generally, rapidly growing tumors, and/or those that precipitate edema, and those with a large diameter (> 4 cm) merit surgery, while patients who are highly comorbid and at high risk of perioperative complications may benefit from SRS [10, 11]. Each procedure carries its own benefits and risks, as outlined; therefore, the preferences of individual patients must be considered and always respected when feasible.
Despite some advantages of SRS, open surgical resection, when chosen to treat patients with appropriate tumor anatomy, and in the hands of experienced surgeons, is associated with improved rates of symptomatic relief, lower rates of complication, and lower rates of symptomatic recurrence, on average, and should continue to be the treatment of choice in patients suffering from tumor-related trigeminal neuralgia.
Availability of data and materials
No data was used in the preparation of this manuscript.
Abbreviations
- TN:
-
Trigeminal neuralgia
- SRS:
-
Stereotactic radiosurgery
References
International Headache Society. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1–211. Available from: https://www.ichd-3.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/The-International-Classification-of-Headache-Disorders-3rd-Edition-2018.pdf. Cited 2023 Oct 8.
Nugroho SW, Anindya Y, Hafif M, Wicaksana BA, Desbassari F, Sadewo W, et al. Open surgery vs. stereotactic radiosurgery for tumour-related trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023;228:107683. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846723000999?via%3Dihub. Cited 2023 Oct 8.
Neff BA, Carlson ML, O’Byrne MM, Van Gompel JJ, Driscoll CLW, Link MJ. Trigeminal neuralgia and neuropathy in large sporadic vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg. 2017;127(5):992–9. Available from: https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg/127/5/article-p992.xml?tab_body=fulltext. Cited 2023 Oct 8.
Park SH, Kano H, Niranjan A, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebellopontine angle meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2014;120(3):708–15. Available from: https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg/120/3/article-p708.xml. Cited 2023 Oct 8.
Bougie E, Masson-Côté L, Mathieu D. Comparison between surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with a single brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer. World Neurosurgery. 2015;83(6):900–6.
Nagano O, Higuchi Y, Serizawa T, Ono J, Matsuda S, Yamakami I, et al. Transient expansion of vestibular schwannoma following stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2008;109(5):811–6. Available from: https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg/109/5/article-p811.xml. Cited 2023 Oct 8.
Ganz JC, Reda WA, Abdelkarim K. Adverse radiation effects after Gamma Knife Surgery in relation to dose and volume. Acta Neurochir. 2009;151(1):9–19. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-008-0174-4#citeas. Cited 2023 Oct 8.
Schulder M, Sreepada GS, Kwartler JA, Cho E-S. Microsurgical removal of a vestibular schwannoma after stereotactic radiosurgery: surgical and pathologic findings. Am J Otol. 1999;20(3):364–8.
Kondziolka D, Perez B, Flickinger JC, Habeck M, Lunsford LD. Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: results and expectations. Arch Neurol. 1998;55(12):1524–9. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/774556#:~:text=Conclusions%20Gamma%20knife%20radiosurgery%20is. Cited 2023 Oct 8.
Gutschenritter T, Venur VA, Combs SE, Vellayappan B, Patel AP, Foote M, et al. The judicious use of stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of large brain metastases. Cancers. 2020;13(1):70.
Carapella CM, Gorgoglione N, Oppido PA. The role of surgical resection in patients with brain metastases. Curr Opin Oncol. 2018;30(6):390–5.
Acknowledgements
Alexander Abouharb — This author’s individual PubMed record can be accessed with the following link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?sort=date&size=200&term=Abouharb+ALZ&cauthor_id=37634878. Please can this work be added to this author’s work on PubMed, subject to approval of publication.
Funding
The authors have no funding sources to declare, as all are medical students.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AA — lead author: responsible for inception of idea and drafting and editing of the letter. HR — co-author: assisted in drafting letter and editorial comments. SM — co-author: assisted in drafting letter and editorial comments.
Authors’ information
AA, HR, and SM are medical students at universities in the UK.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Writing this letter did not involve any human or animal experimentation, patient participation, or use of confidential data; therefore, ethics approval was not required or sought.
Consent for publication
All authors give their consent for this work to be published.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Abouharb, A., Rathnayake, H. & Mehta, S. The efficacy of surgery over stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of tumor-related trigeminal neuralgia. Chin Neurosurg Jl 10, 27 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-024-00379-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-024-00379-y