- Open Access
Expert consensus on drug treatment of chronic subdural hematoma
Chinese Neurosurgical Journal volume 7, Article number: 47 (2021)
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a chronic space-occupying lesion formed by blood accumulation between arachnoid and dura mater, which is usually formed in the third week after traumatic brain injury. Surgical treatment is usually the first choice for patients with CSDH having a significant space-occupying effect. Most of the patients showed good results of surgical treatment, but still some patients had a postoperative recurrence (the recurrence rate was up to 33%). Because CSDH is often seen in the elderly, patients are weak and have many basic diseases. The risk of surgical treatment is high; serious complications and even death (the death rate is up to 32%) can often occur. The overall good prognosis rate of patients aged more than 90 years is 24%. The drug treatment can provide a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients who are weak, intolerable to surgery, or failed in surgery. Low-dose and long-term use of atorvastatin (20mg/d) is suggested for continuous treatment for at least 8 weeks, while low-dose and short-term use of dexamethasone can improve the therapeutic effect of atorvastatin on CSDH. Patients should undergo CT or MRI scanning at least one time within 2 weeks after the start of drug treatment.
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a chronic space-occupying lesion formed by blood accumulation between arachnoid and dura mater, which is usually formed in the third week after traumatic brain injury. The incidence of CSDH is 1–13.1/100,000, and has increased with the aging of the population. The annual incidence can reach 127/100,000 in elderly people aged more than 80 years [1, 2]. CSDH is generally considered to be caused by trauma, but about 50% of patients deny the history of trauma [3, 4]. In addition to trauma, common risk factors related to the development, malabsorption, or recurrence of CSDH include the following: (1) long-term use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs; (2) repeated, or a sudden increase in, chest and abdominal pressure (such as dystocia and constipation); (3) craniotomy; and (4) hematopathy.
Pathogenesis of chronic subdural hematoma
The mechanism of CSDH development and absorption is not very clear. A series of studies were carried out on the pathogenesis of CSDH, such as bleeding from the avulsion of the pontine vein, increased osmotic pressure, hematoma capsule hemorrhage, and local hyperfibrinolysis. All studies were considered to be related to the formation and development of CSDH, but the pathogenesis of CSDH is still unclear up to now [5, 6]. Recent evidence shows that trauma and other causes can lead to the accumulation of blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid in the local subdural cavity. Hematoma-derived exosomes promote abnormal angiogenesis with high permeability by delivering miR-144-5p into endothelial cells, which results in re-bleeding and inhibits hematoma absorption . The secretion of inflammatory cytokines and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) leads to the proliferation of immature blood vessels on the hematoma wall, damage to vascular endothelial cells, opening of gap junctions, and increase of permeability. The continuous leakage of circulating substances results in the gradual increase in hematoma growth . At the same time, the lack of anti-inflammatory and pro-repair factors, such as regulatory T (Treg) cells and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), leads to the recurrence of “immature angiogenesis–endothelial cell damage–vascular leakage” on the hematoma wall, which may be the key factor for CSDH formation [5, 8,9,10,11]. A recent study showed that meningeal lymphatic vessels (mLVs) were also an important pathway for subdural hematoma (SDH) clearance. The presence of SDH hampers the formation and normal functioning of mLVs, which may form a vicious circle and accelerate the accumulation of SDH . These observations indicate that CSDH may be formed because of the malfunction of mLVs and be cleared through mLVs. Other studies have confirmed that immune regulation abnormity and decrease in vascular repair and maturation ability play important roles in the formation and development of CSDH [13,14,15].
Clinical manifestations of chronic subdural hematoma
CSDH is a kind of intracerebral hemorrhage disease, which is insidious in onset and slow in progression. The expansion of hematoma leads to intracranial hypertension, resulting in clinical manifestations, such as headache, dizziness, or limb dysfunction. CT scan and MRI can help make a definite diagnosis. The severity of the disease is often evaluated according to the size of hematoma and the degree of midline shift. However, a hematoma develops slowly, and elderly patients with CSDH often have multiple intracranial volume compensation factors, such as brain atrophy. As a result, these patients with more serious imaging performance tend to have mild symptoms and signs (many patients therefore refuse to operate). In addition, disease progression is slow, and the imaging examination cannot meet the needs of clinical dynamics, leading to repeated and timely evaluation. To accurately and timely evaluate the severity and development trend of patients with CSDH, Markwalder’s team proposed the Markwalder’s grading scale and Glasgow Coma Scale (MGS–GCS scale) based on the comprehensive consideration of clinical symptom severity and consciousness state score of patients, as shown in Table 1 .
Recommendation 1: MGS–GCS system is recommended to be used as the clinical evaluation standard for the severity of patients with CSDH (moderate-quality evidence, strong recommendation).
Most CSDH often increases gradually. Patients’ conditions continue to worsen with the increase in space-occupying effect; even brain hernia occurs and endangers life (hematoma in a few patients can be absorbed naturally after observation and symptomatic treatment ). Surgical treatment is usually the first choice for patients with CSDH having a significant space-occupying effect. Often drilling or burr-hole drainage is chosen . Besides, small bone flap craniotomy or endoscope-assisted evacuation methods are also used [19, 20]. Most of the patients showed good results of surgical treatment, but still some patients had a postoperative recurrence (the recurrence rate was up to 33% ). Even patients had to accept multiple surgical treatments or embolization of the middle meningeal artery because of repeated recurrence . Because CSDH is often seen in the elderly, patients are weak and have many basic diseases, leading the long-term mortality rate is high. It belies the notion that CSDH is a benign disease . The overall good prognosis rate of patients aged more than 90 years is 24% .
Drug treatment for chronic subdural hematoma
The aim of drug treatment is to improve symptoms and signs of patients and promote hematoma absorption. Drug treatment can be divided into symptomatic treatment and treatment promoting hematoma absorption. The purpose of symptomatic treatment is to improve neurological symptoms and signs of patients and create conditions for surgery or other treatments. The treatment promoting hematoma absorption can not only provide a simple and less painful treatment for patients but also can be used to prevent a postoperative recurrence. It can provide a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients who are weak, are intolerable to surgery, or failed in surgery.
The indications of drug treatment for promoting hematoma absorption are as follows: (1) vital signs stable, and MGS–GCS grade 0–2; (2) image showing that the midline shift is less than 1 cm, with no need for emergency surgical intervention; (3) patients having multiple-organ failure, coagulation dysfunction, and other unsuitable or refused surgeries; and (4) the recurrence being prevented after surgery. The contraindications are as follows: (1) MGS–GCS grade 3–4; (2) image showing that brain is severely compressed and the midline shift is more than 1 cm; (3) signs of brain hernia, such as consciousness disorder, nausea, and vomiting; and (4) allergy to the used drug or contraindications of the used drug. The recommended drugs for CSDH treatment in this consensus are atorvastatin and dexamethasone. The related contraindications of these two drugs can refer to the product description and are not described in detail. It is suggested that surgical treatment should be used for patients whose clinical manifestations and neuroimages remain unimproved or deteriorate after a 2-week conservative treatment or more; the hematoma continues to increase, or such patients cannot tolerate drugs.
Atorvastatin therapy for chronic subdural hematoma
Based on the hypothesis of immune regulation disorder and immature angiogenesis, inhibiting an excessive inflammatory response and promoting neovascularization have become a treatment strategy to promote CSDH absorption. The basic studies on traumatic brain injury (TBI) suggest that the increase in EPC mobilization in the circulating blood after TBI can promote the repair of blood–brain barrier, establishment of vascular-nerve unit, and intracranial hematoma absorption, thus improving the prognosis . The clinical observations of patients with TBI confirm that the prognosis of patients with high EPC in the circulating blood is significantly better than that of patients with low EPC . Atorvastatin has been proved to have double regulatory effects of immunoregulation and vascular maturation, which can improve neurological symptoms of rats with TBI [24, 26]. Statins, also termed as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase selective inhibitors, have previously been used for treating hyperlipidemia. However, statins can also improve the level of circulating EPC and the number of Treg cells, inhibit the nonspecific immune inflammatory response, promote the repair of damaged blood vessels, and enhance the endothelialization of artificial blood vessels (stents). They have been used in the clinical treatment of hypertension and coronary heart disease. The basic studies also found that atorvastatin could inhibit the inflammatory reaction on the wall of CSDH, promote the maturation and repair of immature blood vessels (smooth muscle formation of the vascular wall and stabilization of the gap connection of the endothelial barrier), and accelerate hematoma absorption. However, a high dose of atorvastatin can not only mobilize more EPC but also significantly increase the expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tissue growth factor-β (TGF-β), and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). The expression of these factors on the wall of hematoma result in new juvenile vascular hyperplasia and reduce the therapeutic effect of atorvastatin [14, 27]. In clinical practice, the complications of atorvastatin, such as the increase in the levels of liver enzymes and rhabdomyolysis, are found to be closely related to the dosage . Therefore, low-dose and long-term treatment of atorvastatin is more suitable for patients with CSDH.
At present, low-dose atorvastatin has been used by many Chinese neurosurgeons to promote CSDH absorption and prevent the recurrence of CSDH [29,30,31]. Twenty-five Chinese neurosurgery centers have completed a randomized double-blind controlled trial (RCT) on the use of low-dose and long-term atorvastatin (20 mg/d) for treating CSDH. The results showed that the hematoma volume reduction in the atorvastatin treatment group was 12.55 mL more than that in the control group after 8-week treatment. Most patients’ neurological symptoms significantly improved after drug treatment. At the same time, the transfer to surgery rate decreased significantly in the atorvastatin treatment group. No serious side effects were noted in the course of drug treatment . In addition, this treatment scheme has also been applied to treat some refractory CSDH cases, such as young children who cannot tolerate reoperation due to repeated recurrence and patients with coagulation dysfunction (long-term oral administration of warfarin, aspirin, clopidogrel, and other antithrombotic drugs), and to prevent the postoperative recurrence, achieving a good curative effect [30, 31, 33].
Recommendation 2: For patients with CSDH who meet the indications of drug treatment, low-dose and long-term use of atorvastatin (20 mg/day) is suggested for continuous treatment for at least 8 weeks, until neurological symptoms and signs disappear and hematoma absorption is satisfactory; the drug is then discontinued (high-quality evidence, strong recommendation). It is also suitable for perioperative patients to reduce the recurrence rate (moderate-quality evidence, strong recommendation). The dose of atorvastatin can be increased properly when the blood lipid of patients is still elevated during the treatment period. However, for the sake of safety, it is not more than 80 mg/day (low-quality evidence, strong recommendation).
Dexamethasone treatment of chronic subdural hematoma
Dexamethasone (DXM) is a synthetic corticosteroid (hormone), which can inhibit the aggregation of immune inflammatory cells, phagocytosis, and release of inflammatory mediators; nonspecifically inhibit the immune inflammatory response; and reduce and prevent the response of tissues to inflammation. According to the needs of patients in neurosurgery (including patients with CSDH), glucocorticoids such as dexamethasone can be used to replace or assist symptomatic treatment. Because dexamethasone has a long half-life and a wide range of dosage, it is widely used clinically . Previous studies confirmed that the indexes of immune inflammation, such as leukocytes in the circulating blood of patients with CSDH, are not high. However, many immune inflammatory cells, inflammatory factors, and other inflammatory reaction products are present in the hematoma wall and cavity of CSDH . In the 1960s, some scholars applied high doses of dexamethasone to treat CSDH . Since then, clinical reports are available on the application of high-dose dexamethasone to promote CSDH absorption and prevent a postoperative recurrence. However, these reports have different treatment courses and dexamethasone doses [37, 38], and they have not been confirmed by reliable, evidence-based medical researches.
Previous reports on the treatment of CSDH with high-dose dexamethasone showed that the dose of dexamethasone was generally 12–16 mg/day, and the total dose of treatment course was more than 336 mg . A high dose of dexamethasone can easily lead to obesity, gastrointestinal damage, and other steroid-related complications. Therefore, patients with hypertension, diabetes, thromboembolism, gastric and duodenal ulcer, psychosis, electrolyte metabolism abnormality, myocardial infarction, glaucoma, and Cushing’s syndrome are generally not suitable for use. Elderly patients, especially women after menopause, are prone to osteoporosis; also, the prevalence of CSDH is high in the elderly. A retrospective study pointed out that high-dose dexamethasone (6–8 mg/day) could only save 17% of patients with CSDH from surgery, but significantly increased treatment complications . Recent evidence-based medical research (meta-analysis) showed that the dosage of dexamethasone used in CSDH treatment was large, and its side effects were worrying; hence, the rate of its use declined .
Atorvastatin can inhibit the local inflammatory response of CSDH and promote vascular repair, achieving the therapeutic purpose. It can reduce the vascular leakage caused by the CSDH hematoma fluid, but its effect is weak. In clinic, low-dose and short-term dexamethasone treatment refers to the daily dose of 0.5–3 mg/day, and the duration is no more than 4 weeks (the total dose of dexamethasone is about 60 mg) . Low-dose and short-term use of dexamethasone with atorvastatin can enhance the inhibition of vascular leakage caused by an inflammatory reaction and avoid adverse effects of long-term use of dexamethasone. Therefore, low-dose and short-term use of dexamethasone with atorvastatin is expected to better correct the imbalance between damage factors and repair factors in CSDH. One proof of concept (POC) study confirmed that the effect of low-dose atorvastatin combined with low-dose and short-term dexamethasone on CSDH was more significant compared with the single use of low-dose atorvastatin, and it did not increase drug-related side effects. Although a rigorous RCT study has yet to be designed to further confirm the actual efficacy of this combined therapy, this POC showed that the combined therapy could be used as a priority therapy for patients with CSDH without contraindications of drug use, providing a new choice for patients with poor efficacy of atorvastatin monotherapy .
Recommendation 3: High-dose (12–16 mg/day) or long-term (more than 3 months) routine use of dexamethasone is not recommended due to its large side effects (high-quality evidence, strong recommendation); low-dose and short-term use of dexamethasone can improve the therapeutic effect of atorvastatin on CSDH. For patients with a refractory or repeated recurrence of CSDH and without any obvious curative effect of single-use atorvastatin, it is recommended to combine dexamethasone (the first dose is 2.25 mg/day, lasting for 1–2 weeks, gradually reduced and discontinued within 4 weeks) and low-dose atorvastatin (20 mg/day) and then continue to receive low-dose atorvastatin (20 mg/day) until neurological symptoms and signs disappear, and hematoma absorption is satisfactory (low-quality evidence, strong recommendation).
Hemostasis and antifibrinolytic therapy of chronic subdural hematoma
CSDH is an intracranial bleeding disease. Long-term use of oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs are high-risk factors for CSDH . A recent evidence-based medical study (meta-analysis) showed that restarting anticoagulant therapy (excluding antiplatelet drugs) after surgery would increase the risk of CSDH recurrence . For patients who take anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs for a long time, relevant drugs should be stopped immediately after CSDH is confirmed; it is difficult to stop anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs due to stent placement, artificial vascular replacement, and heart valve replacement. Blood coagulation function and platelet-related monitoring should be carried out, and antagonists can be used if necessary. After CSDH hematoma is completely absorbed, patients’ previous use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs should be restored and the coagulation function should be closely monitored. For the specific treatment principles, please refer to the relevant consensus .
CSDH has a high incidence in the elderly, who often have a variety of systemic thrombotic diseases, such as cerebral infarction and coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. The application of hemostatic drugs greatly increases the risk of thrombotic diseases. Hemostatic drugs are not usually used.
The antifibrinolytic therapy of CSDH has received increasing attention. The studies showed that tissue plasminogen activator, fibrin degradation products, and thrombomodulin in hematoma fluid and outer membrane of patients with CSDH increased significantly, suggesting that hyperfibrinolysis is related to repeated blood leakage from blood vessels [45,46,47,48]. Antifibrinolytic drugs can stop bleeding by inhibiting plasminogen activation and plasminogen activity. Clinical case reports and retrospective studies have shown that tranexamic acid, as an antifibrinolytic drug, can be used to treat CSDH, promote hematoma absorption, and reduce recurrence [49,50,51,52,53]. However, some studies believed that antifibrinolytic drugs could increase the incidence of thrombotic events in patients . Therefore, more reliable high-level evidence-based medical research is needed for antifibrinolytic drug treatment.
Recommendation 4: Once patients with CSDH are diagnosed, anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs should be stopped in principle (very low-quality evidence, strong recommendation). In patients with systemic coagulation disorders, hemostatic drugs should be used carefully (very low-quality evidence, strong recommendation). In addition, before a high level of evidence-based medical research, antifibrinolytic drugs are not recommended (low-quality evidence, weak recommendation).
Drug treatment for chronic subdural hematoma complication
Drug treatment for CSDH combined with intracranial hypertension and headache: When CSDH compresses and stimulates brain tissue, it can lead to a headache, nausea, and other symptoms of high intracranial pressure, as well as movement and language dysfunction, and mental symptoms. The treatment using osmotic dehydrating drugs such as mannitol, glycerin fructose, and diuretics can relieve the pain. However, a well-regulated RCT confirmed that osmotic therapy did not lead to hematoma absorption . For patients with obvious headache symptoms, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as acetaminophen, naproxen, and ibuprofen, can be used. Before and during the treatment of osmotic therapy, it is necessary to monitor the renal function and the change in electrolytes, so as to prevent the aggravation of renal insufficiency and the electrolyte disorder among elderly patients . The use of opioid drugs should be reduced. At the same time, regular imaging monitoring should be carried out to pay attention to changes in intracranial hematoma and brain edema.
Drug treatment for CSDH combined with depression, anxiety, and mental and behavior disorder: Some patients with CSDH and mental symptoms, such as anxiety, depression, and insomnia, can use flupenthixol melitracen, diazepam, estazolam, tandospirone, and zaleplon to regulate mood and sleep . Olanzapine is often used to control mental and emotional symptoms, and the dosage of statins should be adjusted for patients with elevated blood lipid levels during the treatment period . However, the application of the aforementioned drugs may cause serious side effects, and patients need to be informed of the risk when the drugs are used for a long time.
Drug treatment for CSDH combined with epilepsy: Epilepsy is one of the main complications before and after CSDH drilling and drainage. The incidence of epilepsy can reach 3–23% after CSDH is diagnosed. The clinical treatment of epilepsy usually involves the use of sodium valproate and other antiepileptic drugs. However, the effect of prophylactic use of antiepileptic drugs is uncertain. The prophylactic use of antiepileptic drugs for patients with CSDH is still controversial. No randomized controlled and recent retrospective studies have evaluated the risk and benefit of the prophylactic use of antiepileptic treatment in patients with CSDH. However, for the elderly and alcoholic patients, the prophylactic use of antiepileptic treatment may be safer and more beneficial .
Recommendation 5: Osmotic therapy is recommended to treat the increase in intracranial pressure caused by CSDH (moderate-quality evidence, strong recommendation), but its use is not recommended to promote CSDH absorption (high-quality evidence, strong recommendation). Antidepressants and sleep aid drugs are recommended to improve the mood and insomnia symptoms among patients with CSDH (moderate-quality evidence, strong recommendation). Olanzapine is recommended to treat patients with mental and emotional disorders (low-quality evidence, strong recommendation). Sodium valproate is recommended to be used as a therapeutic drug for epilepsy in patients with CSDH (moderate-quality evidence, strong recommendation), but it is not recommended to prevent epilepsy in nonepileptic patients (low-quality evidence, weak recommendation).
Evaluation and monitoring of the effectiveness of drug treatment for CSDH
Patients with CSDH who are ineffective in drug treatment often show the aggravation or continuous unremitting of the original neurological symptoms and signs; the imaging shows that hematoma gradually increases. These patients may develop brain herniation due to the increase in hematoma, and therefore, they need to be transferred to surgery in time. The effective treatment for CSDH is shown to be the alleviation of original neurological symptoms and signs, and/or the decrease in hematoma on neuroimaging. For some elderly patients, the volume of hematoma was reduced to a certain extent and no longer reduced. However, the neurological symptoms and signs completely disappeared and the long-term follow-up did not change, which could be regarded as effective treatment.
In addition, about 15% of patients taking atorvastatin have elevated transaminase levels, and a small number of patients have abnormal alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin levels; very few patients have rhabdomyolysis symptoms . However, some patients may have increased heart rate, facial flush, appetite, pore size, and body mass after low-dose dexamethasone treatment. It may also aggravate the condition of patients with diabetes, peptic ulcer, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and osteoporosis. Therefore, all patients receiving CSDH drug treatment need to receive strict monitoring of clinical neurological symptoms and signs, neuroimaging, and blood test.
Recommendation 6: It is recommended that all patients with CSDH receiving drug treatment should be accompanied for 24 h. In the case of aggravation of neurological symptoms, they should go to the nearest neurosurgery emergency department for medical treatment (low-quality evidence, strong recommendation). Patients should undergo CT or MRI scanning at least one time within 2 weeks after the start of drug treatment (low-quality evidence, strong recommendation). Patients should undergo blood routine examination, liver and kidney function tests, and blood lipid and blood glucose tests within 2 weeks after the start of drug treatment, and creatine kinase and myoglobin tests if necessary (low-quality evidence, strong recommendation).
According to the above consensus, the flow chart of CSDH drug treatment is shown in Fig. 1.
Up to now, the exploration of drug therapy to promote CSDH absorption has gone through a long developmental process. In addition to atorvastatin and dexamethasone, researchers have tried to use a variety of drugs or even herbal drugs, but these drug therapies either have uncertain efficacy and huge adverse reactions, or have not been tested in clinical RCTs; safe and reliable evidence is lacking . Therefore, this consensus does not recommend these drugs.
In this consensus, the clinical and basic evidence regarding the use of atorvastatin in the treatment of CSDH is obtained based on the application of Lipitor. The clinical evidence is mainly from adult samples. It is not confirmed that other brands of atorvastatin and other types of statins also have equivalence. It cannot be confirmed that the long-term oral administration of atorvastatin can reduce the incidence of CSDH, and can still achieve good results.
This consensus recommendation is applicable to adult patients with CSDH. For children, please refer to the literature .
The understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of CSDH has gradually deepened with the increasing attention of neuroscience clinical and scientific researchers to this disease and the extensive development of multidisciplinary collaborative research. New effective treatment methods, including new drugs and new surgical methods, may be used in the future. This consensus will also be updated with time, looking forward to a greater breakthrough in the research on CSDH.
This consensus is based only on the literature available at present and the evidence-based medical evidence held by experts participating in the discussion. It is only for the reference of neurosurgery clinicians, does not have a legal effect, and does not serve as the legal basis for any medical disputes and lawsuits. The right of interpretation lies in the committee of experts on the preparation of this consensus.
In this consensus, the evidence quality is divided into four levels: high, moderate, low, and very low, and the recommendation level is divided into two levels: strong recommendation and weak recommendation. See Table 2 for the GRADE classification method .
CSDH is recommended to evaluate the severity of patients by MGS-GCS system. Low-dose and long-term use of atorvastatin (20mg/d) is suggested for continuous treatment for at least 8 weeks, while low-dose and short-term use of dexamethasone can improve the therapeutic effect of atorvastatin on CSDH. Patients should undergo CT or MRI scanning at least one time within 2 weeks after the start of drug treatment.
Availability of data and materials
Gelabert-Gonzalez M, Iglesias-Pais M, Garcia-Allut A, Martinez-Rumbo R. Chronic subdural haematoma: surgical treatment and outcome in 1000 cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2005;107(3):223–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.09.015.
Uno M, Toi H, Hirai S. Chronic subdural hematoma in elderly patients: is this disease benign? Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2017;57(8):402–9. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2016-0337.
Huang J, Tian Y, Song Y, Hu R, Zhang S, Gong Z, et al. Effect of different factors on the short-term outcome of Chinese patients with primary chronic subdural hematoma at different age groups: a two-center retrospective study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00325.
Farhat Neto J, Araujo JL, Ferraz VR, Haddad L, Veiga JC. Chronic subdural hematoma: epidemiological and prognostic analysis of 176 cases. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2015;42(5):283–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912015005003.
Holl DC, Volovici V, Dirven CMF, Peul WC, van Kooten F, Jellema K, et al. Pathophysiology and nonsurgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: from past to present to future. World Neurosurg. 2018;116:402–11 e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.037.
Edlmann E, Giorgi-Coll S, Whitfield PC, Carpenter KLH, Hutchinson PJ. Pathophysiology of chronic subdural haematoma: inflammation, angiogenesis and implications for pharmacotherapy. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-017-0881-y.
Gao C, Gong Z, Wang D, Huang J, Qian Y, Nie M, et al. Hematoma-derived exosomes of chronic subdural hematoma promote abnormal angiogenesis and inhibit hematoma absorption through miR-144-5p. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(24):12147–64. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.102550.
Soleman J, Nocera F, Mariani L. The conservative and pharmacological management of chronic subdural haematoma. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017;147:w14398.
Fu S, Li F, Bie L. Drug therapy for chronic subdural hematoma: Bench to bedside. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;56:16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.07.034.
Song Y, Wang Z, Liu L, Wang D, Zhang J. The level of circulating endothelial progenitor cells may be associated with the occurrence and recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(8):1084–8. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(08)04.
Lee KS. Natural history of chronic subdural haematoma. Brain Inj. 2004;18(4):351–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050310001645801.
Liu X, Gao C, Yuan J, Xiang T, Gong Z, Luo H, et al. Subdural haematomas drain into the extracranial lymphatic system through the meningeal lymphatic vessels. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020;8(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-020-0888-y.
Quan W, Zhang Z, Li P, Tian Q, Huang J, Qian Y, et al. Role of regulatory T cells in atorvastatin induced absorption of chronic subdural hematoma in rats. Aging Dis. 2019;10(5):992–1002. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2018.0926.
Wang D, Li T, Wei H, Wang Y, Yang G, Tian Y, et al. Atorvastatin enhances angiogenesis to reduce subdural hematoma in a rat model. J Neurol Sci. 2016;362:91–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.01.017.
Quan W, Zhang Z, Tian Q, Wen X, Yu P, Wang D, et al. A rat model of chronic subdural hematoma: Insight into mechanisms of revascularization and inflammation. Brain Res. 2015;1625:84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.08.017.
Markwalder TM, Steinsiepe KF, Rohner M, Reichenbach W, Markwalder H. The course of chronic subdural hematomas after burr-hole craniostomy and closed-system drainage. J Neurosurg. 1981;55(3):390–6. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1981.55.3.0390.
Lee GS, Park YS, Min KS, Lee MS. Spontaneous resolution of a large chronic subdural hematoma which required surgical decompression. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015;58(3):301–3. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.58.3.301.
Rovlias A, Theodoropoulos S, Papoutsakis D. Chronic subdural hematoma: surgical management and outcome in 986 cases: a classification and regression tree approach. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6(1):127. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.161788.
Majovsky M, Masopust V, Netuka D, Benes V. Flexible endoscope-assisted evacuation of chronic subdural hematomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158(10):1987–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2902-5.
Liu W, Bakker NA, Groen RJ. Chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical procedures. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(3):665–73. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.5.JNS132715.
Court J, Touchette CJ, Iorio-Morin C, Westwick HJ, Belzile F, Effendi K. Embolization of the Middle meningeal artery in chronic subdural hematoma - a systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019;186:105464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105464.
Miranda LB, Braxton E, Hobbs J, Quigley MR. Chronic subdural hematoma in the elderly: not a benign disease. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(1):72–6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.8.JNS10298.
Stippler M, Ramirez P, Berti A, Macindoe C, Villalobos N, Murray-Krezan C. Chronic subdural hematoma patients aged 90 years and older. Neurol Res. 2013;35(3):243–6. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000163.
Wang B, Sun L, Tian Y, Li Z, Wei H, Wang D, et al. Effects of atorvastatin in the regulation of circulating EPCs and angiogenesis in traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neurol Sci. 2012;319(1-2):117–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2012.04.015.
Liu L, Wei H, Chen F, Wang J, Dong JF, Zhang J. Endothelial progenitor cells correlate with clinical outcome of traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(7):1760–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182186cee.
Xu X, Gao W, Cheng S, Yin D, Li F, Wu Y, et al. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory mechanisms of atorvastatin in a murine model of traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-017-0934-2.
Li T, Wang D, Tian Y, Yu H, Wang Y, Quan W, et al. Effects of atorvastatin on the inflammation regulation and elimination of subdural hematoma in rats. J Neurol Sci. 2014;341(1-2):88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2014.04.009.
Malhotra HS, Goa KL. Atorvastatin: an updated review of its pharmacological properties and use in dyslipidaemia. Drugs. 2001;61(12):1835–81. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200161120-00012.
Wang D, Li T, Tian Y, Wang S, Jin C, Wei H, et al. Effects of atorvastatin on chronic subdural hematoma: a preliminary report from three medical centers. J Neurol Sci. 2014;336(1-2):237–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2013.11.005.
Tang R, Shi J, Li X, Zou Y, Wang L, Chen Y, et al. Effects of atorvastatin on surgical treatments of chronic subdural hematoma. World Neurosurg. 2018;117:e425–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.047.
Chan DY, Chan DT, Sun TF, Ng SC, Wong GK, Poon WS. The use of atorvastatin for chronic subdural haematoma: a retrospective cohort comparison study(). Br J Neurosurg. 2017;31(1):72–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2016.1208806.
Jiang R, Zhao S, Wang R, Feng H, Zhang J, Li X, et al. Safety and efficacy of atorvastatin for chronic subdural hematoma in Chinese patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(11):1338–46. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2030.
Huang J, Li L, Zhang J, Gao C, Quan W, Tian Y, et al. Treatment of relapsed chronic subdural hematoma in four young children with atorvastatin and low-dose dexamethasone. Pharmacotherapy. 2019;39(7):783–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2276.
Emich S, Richling B, McCoy MR, Al-Schameri RA, Ling F, Sun L, et al. The efficacy of dexamethasone on reduction in the reoperation rate of chronic subdural hematoma--the DRESH study: straightforward study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-6.
Pripp AH, Stanisic M. The correlation between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in chronic subdural hematoma patients assessed with factor analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e90149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090149.
Ambrosetto C. Post-traumatic subdural hematoma. Further observations on nonsurgical treatment. Arch Neurol. 1962;6(4):287–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1962.00450220029005.
Sun TF, Boet R, Poon WS. Non-surgical primary treatment of chronic subdural haematoma: Preliminary results of using dexamethasone. Br J Neurosurg. 2005;19(4):327–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688690500305332.
Prud'homme M, Mathieu F, Marcotte N, Cottin S. A pilot placebo controlled randomized trial of dexamethasone for chronic subdural hematoma. Can J Neurol Sci. 2016;43(2):284–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2015.393.
Miah IP, Herklots M, Roks G, Peul WC, Walchenbach R, Dammers R, et al. Dexamethasone therapy in symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma (DECSA-R): a retrospective evaluation of initial corticosteroid therapy versus primary surgery. J Neurotrauma. 2020;37(2):366–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2019.6541.
Holl DC, Volovici V, Dirven CMF, van Kooten F, Miah IP, Jellema K, et al. Corticosteroid treatment compared with surgery in chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019;161(6):1231–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03881-w.
Wang D, Gao C, Xu X, Chen T, Tian Y, Wei H, et al. Treatment of chronic subdural hematoma with atorvastatin combined with low-dose dexamethasone: phase II randomized proof-of-concept clinical trial. J Neurosurg. 2020:1–9.
Yang W, Huang J. Chronic subdural hematoma: epidemiology and natural history. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017;28(2):205–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2016.11.002.
Nathan S, Goodarzi Z, Jette N, Gallagher C, Holroyd-Leduc J. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet use in seniors with chronic subdural hematoma: systematic review. Neurology. 2017;88(20):1889–93. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003918.
Frontera JA, Lewin JJ 3rd, Rabinstein AA, Aisiku IP, Alexandrov AW, Cook AM, et al. Guideline for reversal of antithrombotics in intracranial hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and Society of Critical Care Medicine. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24(1):6–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-015-0222-x.
Fujisawa H, Ito H, Kashiwagi S, Nomura S, Toyosawa M. Kallikrein-kinin system in chronic subdural haematomas: its roles in vascular permeability and regulation of fibrinolysis and coagulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;59(4):388–94. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.59.4.388.
Katano H, Kamiya K, Mase M, Tanikawa M, Yamada K. Tissue plasminogen activator in chronic subdural hematomas as a predictor of recurrence. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(1):79–84. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2006.104.1.79.
Murakami H, Hirose Y, Sagoh M, Shimizu K, Kojima M, Gotoh K, et al. Why do chronic subdural hematomas continue to grow slowly and not coagulate? Role of thrombomodulin in the mechanism. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(5):877–84. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2002.96.5.0877.
Shim YS, Park CO, Hyun DK, Park HC, Yoon SH. What are the causative factors for a slow, progressive enlargement of a chronic subdural hematoma? Yonsei Med J. 2007;48(2):210–7. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2007.48.2.210.
Kageyama H, Toyooka T, Tsuzuki N, Oka K. Nonsurgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma with tranexamic acid. J Neurosurg. 2013;119(2):332–7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.3.JNS122162.
Kutty RK, Peethambaran AK, Sunilkumar, Anilkumar M. Conservative treatment of chronic subdural hematoma in HIV-associated thrombocytopenia with tranexamic acid. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2017;16(3):211–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325957416680294.
Mikkelsen R, Anker-Moller T, Hvas AM, Sunde N. A case of tranexamic acid as adjunctive treatment for chronic subdural hematoma with multiple recurrences. Am J Case Rep. 2017;18:995–9. https://doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.904117.
Stary JM, Hutchins L, Vega RA. Tranexamic acid for recurring subdural hematomas following surgical evacuation: a clinical case series. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2016;77(5):422–6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1584212.
Tanweer O, Frisoli FA, Bravate C, Harrison G, Pacione D, Kondziolka D, et al. Tranexamic acid for treatment of residual subdural hematoma after bedside twist-drill evacuation. World Neurosurg. 2016;91:29–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.03.062.
Iorio-Morin C, Blanchard J, Richer M, Mathieu D. Tranexamic Acid in Chronic Subdural Hematomas (TRACS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):235. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1358-5.
Gjerris F, Schmidt K. Chronic subdural hematoma. Surgery or mannitol treatment. J Neurosurg. 1974;40(5):639–42. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1974.40.5.0639.
Helbok R, Kurtz P, Schmidt JM, Stuart RM, Fernandez L, Malhotra R, et al. Effect of mannitol on brain metabolism and tissue oxygenation in severe haemorrhagic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82(4):378–83. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2009.198754.
Schroeck JL, Ford J, Conway EL, Kurtzhalts KE, Gee ME, Vollmer KA, et al. Review of safety and efficacy of sleep medicines in older adults. Clin Ther. 2016;38(11):2340–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.09.010.
Skrede S, Tvete IF, Tanum L, Steen VM, Bramness JG. Incident users of antipsychotic agents and future use of cholesterol-lowering drugs: an observational, pharmacoepidemiologic study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76(1):e111–6. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.14m08996.
Branco PM, Ratilal BO, Costa J, Sampaio C. Antiepileptic drugs for preventing seizures in patients with chronic subdural hematoma. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(42):6442–5. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612823666171024144318.
Freeman MW, Singh AK, Guidon AC, Arvikar SL, Goldstein RH, Clement NF. Case 22-2019: a 65-year-old woman with weakness, dark urine, and dysphagia. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(3):275–83. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcpc1900589.
Schaumann A, Klene W, Rosenstengel C, Ringel F, Tuttenberg J, Vajkoczy P. COXIBRAIN: results of the prospective, randomised, phase II/III study for the selective COX-2 inhibition in chronic subdural haematoma patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158(11):2039–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2949-3.
Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026.
We thank the members of the Chinese Society of Neurosurgery, Chinese Medical Association, for giving the advises to this review, including Zhou Fei, Hua Feng, Guodong Gao, Jiehe Hao, Lijun Hou, Jin Hu, Ying Huang, Baohua Jiao, Hongming Ji, Xiaochun Jiang, Dezhi Kang, Jianrong Li, Xingang Li, Jinfang Liu, Ning Liu, Xianzhi Liu, Ying Mao, Yan Qu, Wai Sang Poon, Ning Su, Tao Sun, Xiaochuan Sun, Jianjun Wang, Renzhi Wang, Junji Wei, Shuo Wang, Gangfeng Yin, Chao You, Rutong Yu, Xinguang Yu, Xianrui Yuan, Jianmin Zhang, Junyi Zhang, Shiguang Zhao, Yuanli Zhao, Zongmao Zhao, Chunlong Zhong, Xide Zhu, Xingen Zhu, Rongcai Jiang, Dong Wang, Ye Tian, Huijie Wei, Wei Quan, Chuang Gao, Shuyuan Yue, Ping Lei, Quanjun Deng, Shu Zhang, Yuan Zhou, Jian Sun, Shuo An, Yingsheng Wei, and Xintong Ge.
This study was supported by grants 81971176, 81720108015, and 81971173 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China and 19YFZCSY00650, 17JCZDJC35900, 15ZXLCSY00060, and 15ZXJZSY00040 from the Tianjin Research Program of Advanced Technology.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J., Chinese Society of Neurosurgery, Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Neurosurgical Critical Care Specialist Council, Collaborational Group of Chinese Neurosurgical Translational and Evidence-based Medicine. Expert consensus on drug treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. Chin Neurosurg Jl 7, 47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41016-021-00263-z